“Missing the point?”

Household behaviour at an inflection point

The key chart

Monthly HH money flows as a multiple of pre-pandemic levels (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

The key message

The behaviour of UK and euro area households reached a potentially important inflexion point at the start of 4Q21. Household (HH) money flows moderated sharply in October 2021 while monthly flows of consumer credit hit new YTD highs.

Recall that HHs increased their money holdings significantly during the pandemic and built up (estimated) excess savings of £162bn in the UK and €285bn in the EA – a combination of forced and precautionary savings. This meant that the rise in broad money during the pandemic was a reflection of the deflationary forces of increased savings and delayed consumption.

The accumulation of money holdings peaked during 2Q20 and again in 4Q20 and the low point in terms of YoY declines in consumer credit demand was passed in February 2021. Monthly flows of consumer credit have been positive for the past six months and hit YTD highs in October 2021 in both regions. At the same time, the accumulation of money holdings has fallen back to 1.2x and 0.6x pre-pandemic levels in the UK and EA respectively.

Unfortunately, the recent rise in COVID-19 cases, the emergence of the omicron variant and renewed restrictions imposed by the UK and EA governments may result in these points being missed, or, worse still, the positive trends being reversed. That said, firmer economic foundations in both the UK and EA (and higher levels of vaccinations) suggest that both regions are in a stronger position to face renewed COVID challenges than they were a year ago.

Missing the point – the charts that matter

HH money flows

Monthly HH money flows in the UK (£bn) and multiple (x) of 2019 average flow (Source: BoE; CMMP)

HHs in the UK and EA increased their money holdings significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Monthly flows peaked at 6x pre-pandemic levels in the UK in May 2020 (see chart above) and 2.4x pre-pandemic levels in the EA a month earlier (see chart below). At the start of 4Q21, they had moderated to 1.2x and 0.6x pre-pandemic levels in the UK and EA respectively. A key building block for a sustained economic recovery.

Monthly HH deposit flows in the EA (EUR bn) and multiple (x) of 2019 average flow (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Excess HH savings

Estimated build up of excess HH savings in the UK (£bn) (Source: CMMP estimates)

In aggregate, and as a result, HHs have built up excess savings in the form of bank deposits of £162bn in the UK (see chart above) and €285bn in the EA (see chart below) since February 2020. These reflect a combination of forced savings (that may be released relatively quickly to support economic activity) and precautionary savings (that are unlikely to move straight into investment of consumption).

Estimated build up of excess HH savings in the EA (EUR bn) (Source: CMMP estimates)

As noted back in May (see “More bullish on UK consumption”) and confirmed by the ECB in August 2021 (see “Economic Bulletin, Issue 5”). The majority of these accumulated savings have accrued to HHs that already have sizeable savings, have higher incomes, and are older. Such HHs typically spend less from any extra savings they accumulate i.e. they have relatively low marginal propensities to consume. The release of these excess savings is likely to be only partial and gradual, therefore.

Impact on monetary aggregates

M1 as a percentage of M3 in the UK and EA (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

HH behaviour had a marked impact on money supply dynamics during the pandemic with narrow money (M1) representing an ever-larger share of broad money (M3) in both the UK and EA (see chart above). As an example, overnight deposits contributed 6.8ppt to the total EA broad money growth of 7.6% in October 2021 alone (see chart below).

Contribution of M1 (ppt) to growth rate in EA M3 (% YoY) (Source: ECB; CMMP)

This matters because the expansion of broad money during the pandemic reflected the deflationary force of HHs increasing their savings and delaying consumption. Money sitting in overnight deposits contributes to neither growth nor inflation.

HH demand for consumer credit

Growth rates in consumer credit in the UK and EA (% YoY) (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Annual growth rates in consumer credit reached a low point in February 2021 in both the UK (-10% YoY) and the EA (-3% YoY). The rate of decline has narrowed subsequently to -1.0% in the UK in October. In the EA, annual growth rates turned positive two months later in April 2020 (see chart above).

Monthly consumer credit flows in the UK (£ bn) and EA (EUR bn) (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

More importantly, monthly flows of consumer credit have been positive for the past six months and reached their highest levels YTD in both the UK (£0.7bn) and EA (€2.7bn) respectively (see chart above).

Conclusion

A moderation in monthly HH money flows and a recovery in demand for consumer credit represent important foundations for a sustained recovery in the UK and the EA. The rise in COVID-related risks comes at a very delicate and unfortunate time, therefore, for the recovery in both regions. It remains too early to say whether recent events will reverse these dynamics in a meaningful manner. The positive news is that firmer economic foundations in both the UK and EA suggest that both regions are in a stronger position to face these challenges than they were a year ago.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Not what the doctor ordered”

Rising UK COVID-19 risks come at an unfortunate time

The key chart

Trends in monthly HH money flows (£bn) compared to 2019 average monthly flows (Source: BoE; CMMP)

The key message

The rise in COVID-19 cases and the discovery of the new Omicron variant come at a delicate and unfortunate time for the UK economic recovery (and associated recovery trades).

According to the Bank of England’s latest “Money and Credit” release for October 2021, monthly household money flows were moderating and demand for consumer credit was recovering at the start of 4Q21 – positive trends in two of our three key signals for 2021. So called “faster indicators” such as credit and debit card payments also indicate that positive trends continued into mid-November 2021.

There is never a good time for COVID-related risks to be rising, but it is particularly unfortunate that the threat of renewed uncertainty and restrictions on economic activity has coincided with an apparent inflexion point in the messages from the UK money sector.

Not what the doctor ordered in either a literal or metaphorical sense.

Not what the doctor ordered

The rise in COVID-19 cases and the discovery of the new Omicron variant come at a delicate and unfortunate time for the UK economic recovery and associated recovery trades.

COVID cases and deaths (7 day MVA) in the UK (Source: UK government; CMMP)

The number of people who tested positive has risen to 42, 583 according to the latest data provided on 29 November 2021. This represents an increase of 4,574 cases (12%) since the end of October 2021 (see chart above). In response to the identification of the new variant, the UK government has tightened restrictions on face coverings and entry into the UK. The booster programme for vaccines has also been accelerated. It remains too early to know if further restrictions will be required.

Why the timing is so bad

Key signal #1: looking for a moderation in HH money flows (Source: BoE; CMMP)

According to the Bank of England’s latest “Money and Credit” release for October 2021, monthly household money flows slowed sharply at the start of 4Q21.

These flows represent a useful proxy for household uncertainty. They peaked at £28bn (6x pre-pandemic levels) in May 2020 and again at £21bn (4x pre-pandemic levels) in December 2020. Note that money flows combine forced and precautionary elements of household savings. During periods of “lockdown” (see black bars in chart above), they averaged 4x their pre-pandemic levels reflecting the added impact of forced savings. Between lockdowns and since lockdowns they have averaged 2x their pre-pandemic levels.

Monthly flows fell from £9bn (2x pre-pandemic levels) in September 2021 to £5bn (1.2x pre-pandemic levels) in October 2021, the lowest monthly flow since February 2020.

Key signal #2: looking for a recovery in consumer credit demand (£bn LHS, % YoY RHS) (Source: BoE; CMMP)

UK households borrowed £0.7bn in consumer credit in October 2021, the strongest net borrowing since July 2020 (see chart above). Monthly flows have been positive since April 2021 – seven consecutive months of positive net borrowing. The majority of this borrowing (£0.6bn) was additional borrowing on credit cards, which was also the strongest since July 2020 (£0.9bn).

The annual growth rate in consumer credit remains negative, however (green line in chart above). That said, the YoY growth rate has narrowed to -1.0% in October from -1.7% in September and the low of -9.1% in January 2021.

Credit and debit card payments (7d rolling average) in aggregate and on delayable goods in relation to pre-pandemic levels (Source: ONS; CMMP)

So called “faster indicators” such as credit and debit card payments also indicate that these positive trends continued into mid-November 2021. After a sharp recovery in payments in March and April 2021 (following the easing of restrictions) momentum slowed in 2Q21 and 3Q21. Aggregate card payments rebounded in November, however, to reach 103% of pre-pandemic levels (see chart above).

The build up in excess HH savings (£bn) during the COVID-19 pandemic (Source: BoE; CMMP estimates)

Spending on “delayable” goods such as clothing and furniture has also recovered to 104% of pre-pandemic levels during November. This matters because spending on delayable goods is a useful indicator regarding the extent to which the £160bn in excess savings built up during the pandemic is returning to the economy via household consumption. The evidence to date is that while the build up of excess savings has slowed, this cash has yet to be spent (see chart above). A positive note to carry into the new year.

Conclusion

There is never a good time for COVID-related risks to be rising, but it is particularly unfortunate that the threat of renewed uncertainty and restrictions on economic activity has coincided with an apparent inflexion point in the messages from the UK money sector. Not what the doctor ordered in either a literal or metaphorical sense.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Enough is enough”

Growth in the wrong type of lending triggers ECB call for policy shift

The key chart

Growth rates (% YoY) in average RRE prices and loans for house purchase (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The key message

In its latest “Financial Stability Review” (November 2021), the ECB calls for a policy shift away from short term support measures towards “mitigating risks from higher medium term financial stability vulnerabilities, in particular emerging cyclical and real estate risks.”

This is a welcome development given the extent to which (unorthodox) policy measures have fuelled growth in the “wrong type of lending” to date, and the negative implications this has for future growth, leverage, financial stability and income inequality.

Macroprudential instruments include capital measures (e.g. higher risk weights) and borrower-based measures (e.g. LTV limits). Their adoption varies across the euro area currently, with six economies adopting a combination of both instruments, nine economies adopting borrower-based measures alone, and four economies having no measures in place (Germany, Spain, Italy and Greece).

Further tightening of existing instruments may be required in several economies where RRE vulnerabilities are continuing to build up, but Germany stands out given current house price and lending dynamics, the extent of RRE overvaluation and the absence of targeted macroprudential measures.

“Enough is enough”

Over the past two years, I have been highlighting the hidden risk that unorthodox monetary policies in the euro area (and elsewhere) were fuelling growth in the “wrong type of lending”. From this, I have argued that the resulting shift from productive COCO-based lending towards less-productive FIRE-based lending (see chart below) has negative implications for leverage, growth, financial stability and income inequality in the future.

Outstanding stock of private sector lending (EUR bn, LHS) broken down by type and share of FIRE-based lending in total lending (%, RHS) (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Earlier this month, I also argued that it was appropriate, therefore, to expect new macroprudential measures for residential real estate soon. The ECB agrees (finally). In their latest “Financial Stability Review” (November 2021), the ECB is calling for a policy shift away from short-term support towards mitigating risks from higher medium-term financial stability vulnerabilities including residential real estate (RRE) risks.

2Q21 RRE price growth (% YoY) plotted against level of pre-pandemic valuation (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The ECB’s analysis includes three key risk factors:

  • First, nominal house prices grew at 7.3% in 2Q21, the fastest rate of growth since 2005 (see key chart above)
  • Second, house price and lending dynamics have been much stronger in many countries with pre-existing vulnerabilities. For example, despite above average degrees of over-valuation pre-pandemic (ie, >4% estimated overvaluation), RRE prices grew at above-average rates (ie, >7% YoY) in Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, Germany, and Belgium in the year to end 2Q21 (see chart above)
  • Third, there is evidence of a progressive deterioration in lending standards, as reflected in the increasing share of loans with high LTV ratios. The share of new loans with LTVs above 90% reached 52% in 2020 compared with only 32% in 2016 (see chart below)

The ECB also notes “high and rising levels of HH indebtedness”, but this is less of a risk, in my opinion, given that the HH debt ratio of 61% GDP is well below the BIS’ threshold of 85% GDP.

Share of loans with LTV >90% in total new loan production (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Macroprudential instruments include capital measures (eg higher risk weights) and borrower-based measures (eg, LTV limits). Their adoption varies across the euro area with six economies adopting a combination of both instruments (green bubbles in chart below), nine economies adopting only borrower-based measures (orange bubbles in chart below), and four economies having no measures in place – Germany, Spain, Italy and Greece (red bubbles in chart below, although Greece not shown).

RRE price growth plotted against mortgage loan growth 1H21 v 1H20. Size of bubbles represents HH debt ratio and colour represents current macroprudential framework (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Further tightening of existing instruments may be required in several economies where RRE vulnerabilities are continuing to build up, but Germany stands out given the combination of house price and lending dynamics, the extent of overvaluation and the lack of macroprudential measures.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“How much? How productive?”

ECB claims from a CMMP perspective

The key chart

Annual growth (% YoY) in EA private sector lending split between FIRE-based and COCO-based lending (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The key message

Is the ECB correct to argue that, “monetary policy measures continue to support lending conditions and volumes” in the euro area? Yes, but only up to a point.

On the supply-side, the APP, PEPP and TLTRO III programmes are having a positive impact on banks’ liquidity positions and overall market financing conditions. On the demand side, borrowing costs are at (mortgages) or close to (NFC loans) historic lows in nominal terms and at historically low and negative levels in real terms. So far, so good.

That said, lending volumes are unexciting in relation to recent trends and previous cycles and currently negative in real terms. No compelling volume story here.

More importantly, current policy measures are supporting the “wrong type of credit”.

Less-productive lending that supports capital gains through higher asset prices (FIRE-based lending) contributed 2.5ppt to the 3.2% total loan growth in September 2021. Worryingly, this is part of longer-term trend. While the outstanding stock of private sector loans hit a new high in September, the stock of productive lending that supports production and income formation (COCO-based lending) remains below its January 2009 peak.

This matters for two key reasons. First, the shift from COCO-based lending to FIRE-based lending has negative implications for leverage, growth, financial stability and income inequality (expect new macroprudential measures for residential real estate soon). Second, it re-enforces the importance of an on-going policy response that remains “fiscal, first and foremost”.

“How much? How productive?”

In its latest Euro area bank lending survey, the ECB argues that, “monetary policy measures continue to support lending conditions and volumes” in the euro area (EA). Is this correct?

The supply-side

“Liquidity-providing” monetary policy operations in EUR bn (Source: ECB; CMMP)

On the supply-side, EA banks report that “the ECB’s asset purchase programme (APP), the pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP), and the third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTRO III) continues to have a positive impact on their liquidity positions and market financing conditions” (see chart above).

The demand-side

Composite cost-of borrowing for house purchases and NFC loans in nominal and real terms (Source: ECB; CMMP)

One the demand side, borrowing costs are at (mortgages) or close to (NFC loans) historic lows in nominal terms and at historically low and negative levels in real terms (see chart above). In September 2021, the composite cost-of-borrowing for house purchases hit a new low of 1.30% (-2.03% in real terms). The composite cost of borrowing for NFC’s was 1.48%, 0.8ppt above its March 2021 low, but a new low in real terms (-1.86%).

How exciting is the volume story?

Annual growth (% YoY) in private sector lending in nominal and real terms (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Lending volumes are unexciting in relation to recent trends and previous cycles and currently negative in real terms. Lending to the private sector grew 3.2% YoY in September 2021 both on a reported basis and after adjusting for loan sales and securitisation. In nominal terms, lending growth has been relatively stable since March 2021 but is 2ppt lower than the recent peak growth recorded in May 2020 (5.2% YoY). Lending growth in the current cycle is relatively subdued, however, in relation to past cycles (see chart above). Furthermore, in real terms, lending in September fell slightly when adjusted for HICP inflation.

No compelling volume story here.

Loan growth from the ECB perspective

Annual loan growth with ECB breakdown by borrower (Source: ECB; CMMP)

As an aside, the ECB typically classifies lending by type of borrower – households (HHs), non-financial corporations (NFCs), non-monetary financial corporations (NMFCs) and insurance companies and pension funds (ICPFs) – with further subdivisions based in the type of HH borrowing and the maturity of NFC borrowing.

In September 2021, HH lending contributed 2.2pt to the total 3.2% YoY growth, essentially mortgages. NFCs and NMFCs contributed 0.6ppt and 0.5ppt respectively but lending to ICPFs made a slight negative contribution of -0.1ppt.

Loan growth from the CMMP Perspective

CMMP analysis presents an alternative classification based on the productivity of credit use. Broadly speaking, lending can be spilt into two distinct types: lending to support productive enterprise; and lending to finance the sale and purchase of existing assets. The former includes lending to NFCs and HH consumer credit (and other HH lending) and is referred collectively here as “COCO-based” lending (COrporate and COnsumer). The latter includes loans to non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) and HH mortgage or real estate debt and is referred collectively here as “FIRE-based” lending (FInancials and Real Estate).

Note that COCO-based lending typically supports production and income formation while FIRE-based lending typically supports capital gains through higher asset prices.

Supporting the “wrong type of credit”

Annual loan growth with CMMP breakdown by productivity of use (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Viewed from a CMMP perspective, current policy measures are supporting the “wrong type of credit”. Less-productive lending that supports capital gains through higher asset prices (FIRE-based lending) contributed 2.5ppt to the 3.2% total loan growth in September 2021 (see chart above).

Annual loan growth broken down by productivity of use since September 2006 (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Worryingly, this is part of a longer-term trend. As can be seen from the chart above, higher volumes in the pre-GFC period were more balanced with more-productive COCO-based lending accounting for 56% of total outstanding loans. Today, that share has fallen to 48%.

Outstanding stock (EUR bn) of COCO-based lending (Source: ECB; CMMP)

As noted in August 2021, while the outstanding stock of credit hit a new high in September, the stock of productive COCO-based lending (€5,470bn) remains below its January 2009 peak (€5,517bn). In other words, the aggregate growth in lending since early 2009 has come exclusively from FIRE-based lending which now accounts for 52% of the outstanding stock of loans (see chart below).

Outstanding stock (EUR bn) of COCO-based and FIRE-based lending (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Conclusion

The ECB is entitled to argue that monetary policy measures have supported lending conditions and volumes. However, current lending volumes are unexciting in relation to previous cycles and negative in real terms. Policy is also supporting the “wrong type” of credit – fuelling FIRE-based lending rather than productive COCO-based lending that supports production and income formation.

This matters for two key reasons. First, the shift from COCO-based lending to FIRE-based lending has negative implications for leverage, growth, financial stability and income inequality. During the COVID-19 pandemic, some national authorities eased macroprudential measures for residential real estate (RRE). This week, however, the ECB argued that further macroprudential measures should be considered where RRE vulnerabilities continue to build up. (Watch this space.)  Second, it re-enforces the importance of an on-going policy response that remains “fiscal, first and foremost”.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“A return to abnormality”

Looking behind the OBR’s forecasts of improving UK government finances

The key chart

Historic and forecast UK sectoral net lending – % GDP, rolling annual average (Source: OBR; CMMP)

The key message

The OBR’s forecasts of a rapid improvement in UK government finances (the good news) assume unusual behaviour on the part of the UK private sector and the RoW and imply a “return to the abnormality” of sustained domestic UK deficits counterbalanced by significant and persistent current account deficits (the bad news). Viewed from a sector balances perspective, the risks appear tilted to the downside ie, government finances may not recover as quickly as forecast.

The OBR published its latest “Economic and fiscal outlook” on Wednesday, 27 October 2021. The Office recognised the positive impact of the UK government’s fiscal response in protecting household and corporate incomes during the pandemic and through 2021. Looking further forward, the OBR forecasts a rapid improvement in the government’s finances, with borrowing falling back below £100bn next year and stabilising around £44bn (<2% of GDP) in the medium term.

The forecasts assume certain behaviours from the other economic sectors, namely the domestic private sector (households and corporates) and the RoW. Under the latest forecasts, the UK household sector, which is typically a net saver, shifts (unusually) to a net deficit position over the forecast period. Given the high level of existing debt, this requires HHs to sustain historically low savings ratios of c.5%. The NFC sector, which is typically a net borrower, returns to a deficit position in 2Q22 and then runs relatively high deficits of c.3% of GDP over the rest of the period. To offset these twin domestic deficits, the RoW runs equal and historically high counterbalancing surpluses vis-à-vis the UK.

In short, the forecast improvements in UK government finances rely on dynamic adjustments by other economic sectors and unusual patterns of behaviour beyond that. This suggests obvious risks that the forecasts will not be met. Furthermore, the assumed end-result is one where sustained, twin domestic deficits are counterbalanced by “significant and persistent current account deficits. The OBR describes this as a “return to more normal levels”. CMMP analysis suggests it is anything but.

“Returning to abnormality”

The OBR published its latest “Economic and fiscal outlook” on Wednesday, 27 October 2021. The outlook sets out the Office’s forecasts for the economy and public finances to 2026-27 and provides an assessment of whether the Government is likely to achieve its fiscal targets.

The impact of COVID on UK sectoral net lending postions – % GDP, rolling annual average (Source: OBR; CMMP)

The OBR recognised the positive impact of the UK government’s fiscal response in ensuring that household (HH) and corporate (NFC) incomes did not fall “nearly as much as this expenditure or output” during the pandemic.

Government net borrowing rose to 12.5% of GDP in 2020, to pay for the fiscal support (see chart above). The HH net surplus rose to 7.8% of GDP, versus a 1Q04-1Q21 average of 2.5%. The NFC deficit moved into balance versus a 1Q04-1Q21 average deficit of -0.8% of GDP. Hence, the private sector’s net surplus rose to 7.8% of GDP versus a 1Q04-1Q21 average of 1.7% of GDP. These imbalances have persisted into 2021 as restrictions and support remained in place, albeit to a lesser degree.

UK public sector net lending – % GDP, rolling annual average (Source: OBR; CMMP)

Looking forward, the OBR forecasts a rapid improvement in the UK government’s financial position (see chart above, which compares the latest forecasts with the previous version), with borrowing falling “back below £100bn next year, declining more slowly thereafter to stabilise at around £44bn (1.5% of GDP) in the medium term.” Such and improvement would be sufficient for Rishi Sunak, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, to meet his fiscal target of getting “underlying debt falling as a share of GDP by the third year of our forecast (2024-25)”.

Domestic government balance + domestic private balance + foreign balance (must) = zero

These forecasts assume certain behaviours from the other economic sectors, namely the domestic private sector and the RoW. Recall that, from national accounting principles (see identity above), we know that the deficits run by one or more economic sectors must equal surpluses run by other sector(s).

UK household sector net lending – % GDP, rolling annual average (Source: OBR; CMMP)

Over the forecast period, the UK household sector, which is typically a net saver, shifts (unusually) to a net borrowing position. The OBR expects the HH net surplus to peak at 10% GDP in 1Q21, fall to 5.7% of GDP by 4Q21 and then (unusually) move into deficit by 4Q22 and for much of the forecast period out to 1Q27. Note that for any sector to run a deficit it must either increase its borrowing and/or reduce its accumulation of net financial assets.

UK HH and NFC debt ratios – % GDP (Source: BIS; CMMP)

Given the high level of HH debt, this requires HHs to sustain historically low savings ratios. At the end of 1Q21, the UK HH debt ratio was 91% of GDP, 6ppt above the BIS threshold limit and only 5ppt below its all-time high (see chart above). This suggests that HH are unlikely to increase borrowing levels significantly over the period.

Unsurprisingly, therefore, the OBR forecasts place a greater emphasis on HH savings. First, they assume that HHs will spend c.5% of the excess savings built up during the pandemic, a reasonable assumption. Second, and following on from this, they assume that the HH savings ratio will fall rapidly and stabilise at or around historic lows of c.5%, a more aggressive assumption (see chart below). History suggests that the risks to these assumptions lie clearly to the downside.

Historic and forecast HH savings ratio (Source: OBR; CMMP)

The NFC sector, which is typically a net borrower, returns to a deficit position in 2Q22 and then runs relatively high deficits of c.3% of GDP over the rest of the period (see chart below). This compares with a 1Q04-1Q21 average deficit of just under 1% of GDP. Again, given the current level of NFC borrowings the risks to these forecasts and to the level of NFC investment appear tilted to the downside.

UK non-financial corporation sector net lending – % GDP, rolling annual average (Source: OBR; CMMP)

To offset these twin domestic deficits, the RoW runs equal and historically high counterbalancing surpluses vis-à-vis the UK. The net surplus of the RoW is forecast to increase fro 3.3% of GDP currently (in-line with historic average) to 5.3% in early 2023 and then stabilise at c.4.5% for the rest of the forecast period. In other words, the UK is assumed to be increasingly reliant on the RoW as a net lender.

RoW sector net lending – % GDP, rolling annual average (Source: OBR; CMMP)

Conclusion

Historic and forecast UK sectoral net lending – % GDP, rolling annual average (Source: OBR; CMMP)

The forecast improvements in UK government finances rely on dynamic adjustments by other economic sectors and unusual patterns of behaviour beyond that. This suggests obvious risks that the forecasts will not be met.

Furthermore, the assumed end-result is one where sustained, twin domestic deficits are counterbalanced by “significant and persistent current account deficits. The OBR describes this as a “return to more normal levels”. CMMP analysis suggests it is anything but.

Please note that summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Neither usual, nor sustainable”

What to look for in the OBR’s “Economic and Fiscal Outlook”

The key chart

Actual and OBR forecasts for UK private and public sectoral net lending (% GDP)
(Source: OBR; CMMP)

The key message

On Wednesday this week (27 October 2021), the OBR will publish its latest “Economic and fiscal outlook”. Among the 200+ pages of detailed analysis and forecasts, one page and one chart are key – “sectoral net lending” (typically around page 70!). This examines the impact of expected income and expenditure of the three economic sectors (private, public and RoW) for the path of each sector’s net lending to, or borrowing from, the others. A core element of CMMP analysis.

The previous outlook (March 2021) assumed that the two domestic sectors would return to running simultaneous net financial deficits in 2022 and described this situation as “more usual.” Of course, this is only possible if the RoW runs a compensating net financial surplus at the same time (ie current account surplus vis-à-vis the UK).

In short, existing official forecasts assume persistent and significant fiscal and current account deficits between 2022 and 2026. From a CMMP perspective, this is neither usual nor sustainable. Hence our attention will naturally focus on any revisions to these assumptions. Watch this space…

Neither usual, not sustainable

The OBR will publish its “Economic and fiscal outlook” (EFO) for the UK on Wednesday October 2021. The EFO sets out the Office’s forecasts for the economy and the public finances and provides an assessment of whether the Government is likely to achieve its fiscal targets. From a CMMP perspective, the key section is the one page summary of sectoral net lending. Specifically, the impact of expected income and expenditure of different economic sectors for the path of each sector’s net lending to, or borrowing from, the others.

In the previous EFO (March 2021), the OBR argued that, “Over the medium term, sectoral lending positions return to more usual levels. As can be seen from the key chart above, this assumed that the two domestic sectors would both be running simultaneous net financial deficits (ie, both spending more than they earn). Note that, in the case of a simple two-sector economy, it would be impossible for the private and public sectors to be running deficits at the same time.

Actual and OBR forecasts for UK private and public and RoW sectoral net lending (% GDP)
(Source: OBR; CMMP)

Of course, in practice the two domestic sectors are linked economically to foreign FIs, NFCs, HHs and governments, collectively termed the rest-of-the-world (RoW). From this, we can see that the previous OBR forecasts assume that the RoW would run compensating net financial surpluses (current account surpluses) vis-à-vis the UK domestic sectors.

In short, existing forecasts assume significant and persistent fiscal and current account deficits from 2022-2026. From a CMMP perspective, this is neither usual nor sustainable. Hence, our attention will naturally turn to the revised assumptions this week…

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Bashing the plastic?”

UK card payments trending below pre-pandemic levels

The key chart

Aggregate card payments in relation to pre-pandemic levels (Source: ONS; CMMP)

The key message

Despite accumulating close to £160bn in excess savings during the pandemic, UK households (HHs) appear reluctant to “bash their plastic”.

All categories of credit and debit card payments – delayable, social, staples and work-related – have recovered strongly during 2021. Unsurprisingly, the biggest increases have occurred in social and work-related payments with the easing/lifting of restrictions. Aggregate payments peaked at 106% of pre-pandemic levels on 5 May 2021, however, and have been trending slightly below pre-pandemic levels ever since.

HHs have been spending more on getting to work recently than on delayable items such as clothing and food, with the recent fuel shortages creating an additional, albeit temporary spike, in the former type of spending.

Significantly, delayable spending peaked at 121% of pre-pandemic levels a week after the lifting of restrictions on the opening of non-essential stores on 12 April 2021 and have fallen back to 92% of pre-pandemic levels now. This matters because spending on delayable goods is a useful indicator regarding the extent to which excess savings are returning to the economy via HH consumption in a sustained fashion.

The on-going message from the money sector here is that while the direction of travel in HH consumption has been positive YTD, momentum has slowed. This is consistent with historical evidence that suggests (1) that HHs take time to respond to shocks, (2) that unanticipated increases in HH wealth tend to be saved rather than spent; and (3) that excess savings were built up by HHs with relatively low marginal propensities to consume.  

The six charts that matter

CMMP estimates for excess HH savings built up during the pandemic (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Despite accumulating close to £160bn in excess savings during the pandemic (see chart above), UK households (HHs) appear reluctant to “bash their plastic”.

Card payments in relation to pre-pandemic levels by spending category (Source: ONS; CMMP)

All categories of credit and debit card payments – delayable, social, staples and work-related – have recovered strongly during 2021 (see chart above). Unsurprisingly, the biggest increases have occurred in social and work-related payments with the easing/lifting of restrictions (see chart below).

Change (ppt) in relative payments since end-2000 by category (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Aggregate payments peaked at 106% of pre-pandemic levels on 5 May 2021, however, and have been trending slightly below pre-pandemic levels ever since (see chart below).

Aggregate card payments in relation to pre-pandemic levels since end-2020 (Source: ONS; CMMP)

HHs have been spending more on getting to work recently than on delayable items such as clothing and food, with the recent fuel shortages creating an additional, albeit temporary spike, in the former type of spending (see chart below).

Payments on delayable and work-related goods in relation to pre-pandemic levels (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Significantly, delayable spending peaked at 121% of pre-pandemic levels a week after the lifting of restrictions on the opening of non-essential stores on 12 April 2021 and have fallen back to 92% of pre-pandemic levels now (see chart below). This matters because spending on delayable goods is a useful indicator regarding the extent to which excess savings are returning to the economy via HH consumption.

Aggregate and delayable goods payments in relation to pre-pandemic levels (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Conclusion

The on-going message from the money sector here is that, while the direction of travel in HH consumption has been positive YTD, momentum has slowed. This is consistent with historical evidence that suggests (1) that HHs take time to respond to shocks, (2) that unanticipated increases in HH wealth tend to be saved rather than spent; and (3) that excess savings were built up by HHs with relatively low marginal propensities to consume.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Note to Rishi”

It’s the economy, not the budget, that has to balance

The key chart

UK financial sector balances (4Q rolling averages, £bn) (Source: ONS; CMMP)

The key message

Note to Rishi – a “pragmatic” and “responsible” fiscal outcome for the UK is one that delivers a balanced economy not a balanced budget.

Pre-COVID, the UK was running large and persistent sector imbalances and was increasingly reliant on the rest-of-the-world (RoW) as a net lender. The HH sector, which plays a critical role in the UK economy (FCE/GDP) and bank lending, had been funding consumption by dramatically reducing its savings rate and accumulation of net financial assets and was poised to disappoint.

In the face of the pandemic, the UK private sector shifted to an unprecedented net lending position of 21% GDP, 13ppt above the 4Q09 post-GFC peak. The HH sector alone moved from a net borrowing position of 0.4% GDP in 3Q19 to a net lending position of 15% GDP in 2Q20 as the HH savings ratio rose to a record high of 23% GDP. Extraordinary and co-ordinated responses to these extraordinary times came from the UK government and the Bank of England, including extensions to the furlough scheme and increases in the central bank’s buying programme. The responses were both timely and appropriate. The UK government increased its net borrowing positions to 25% GDP in 2Q20 and 14% in 3Q20.

According the latest ONS statistics, the net lending position of the UK private sector was still 6% GDP at the end of 2Q21, down from 10% in the previous quarter but still well above the LT (pre-COVID) average of just under 1% GDP. Both non-financial and financial corporations increased their net lending positions in 2Q21 to 1% of GDP respectively. In contrast, the HH’s net lending position fell from 9% GDP (£52bn) in 1Q21 to 5% GDP (£27bn) in 2Q driven by a recovery in spending. Note, however, that it remains double its LT average. On a positive note, the HH savings rate fell to 12% in 2Q21 from 18% in 1Q21 (the second highest rate on record).

The recent messages from the UK money sector suggest that HHs remain uncertain with monthly HH deposit flows rising again in August to double their pre-pandemic levels and demand for consumer credit remaining weak. So-called “faster-indicators” also indicate that credit and debit card payments remain below their pre-pandemic levels.

As the UK emerges from the COVID pandemic, large sector imbalances remain but in very different ways to the pre-COVID period. The private sector continues to disinvest, HHs remain uncertain and credit demand (ex-mortgages) remains subdued. UK HHs have built up c£160bn of excess savings during the pandemic but history suggests that (1) they take time to respond to shocks and (2) that unanticipated increases in wealth tend to be saved rather than spent. The co-ordinated fiscal and monetary policy response to the pandemic was timely and appropriate but it remains premature to be discussing significant fiscal adjustments and/or an end to “bigger government”.

Contrary to some of the current political rhetoric, budget outcomes are inappropriate goals in themselves. The correct budget outcome is the one that delivers a balanced economy, not a balanced budget.

“Note to Rishi” – the charts that matter

UK financial sector balances – RoW deliberately shaded out! (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Pre-COVID, the UK was running large and persistent sector imbalances and was increasingly reliant on the rest-of-the-world (RoW) as a net lender (see chart above). The HH sector, which plays a critical role in the UK economy (FCE/GDP) and bank lending, had been funding consumption by dramatically reducing its savings rate and accumulation of net financial assets and was poised to disappoint (see chart below).

Poised to disappoint – HH gross savings and savings ratio (Source: ONS; CMMP)
Private sector net lending position as % GDP (Source: ONS; CMMP)

In the face of the pandemic, the UK private sector shifted to an unprecedented net lending position of 21% GDP, 13ppt above the 4Q09 post-GFC peak (see chart above). The HH sector alone moved from a net borrowing position of 0.4% GDP in 3Q19 to a net lending position of 15% GDP in 2Q20 as the HH savings ratio rose to a record high of 23% GDP (see chart below).

A record high in HH savings (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Extraordinary and co-ordinated responses to these extraordinary times came from the UK government and the Bank of England, including extensions to the furlough scheme and increases in the central bank’s buying programme. The responses were both timely and appropriate (see chart below). The UK government increased its net borrowing positions to 25% GDP in 2Q20 and 14% in 3Q20.

UK policy responses from a sector balances perspective (Source: ONS; CMMP)

According the latest ONS statistics, the net lending position of the UK private sector was still 6% GDP at the end of 2Q21, down from 10% in the previous quarter but still well above the LT (pre-COVID) average of just under 1% GDP. Both non-financial and financial corporations increased their net lending positions in 2Q21 to 1% of GDP respectively (see chart below).

Breakdown of private sector net financial balances (Source: ONS; CMMP)

In contrast, the HH’s net lending position fell from 9% GDP (£52bn) in 1Q21 to 5% GDP (£27bn) in 2Q driven by a recovery in spending. Note, however, that it remains double its LT average (see chart below). On a positive note, the HH savings rate fell to 12% in 2Q21 from 18% in 1Q21 (the second highest rate on record). The recent messages from the UK money sector suggest that HHs remain uncertain with monthly HH deposit flows rising again in August to double their pre-pandemic levels and demand for consumer credit remaining weak. So-called “faster-indicators” also indicate that credit and debit card payments remain below their pre-pandemic levels.

HH sector net lending position (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Conclusion

As the UK emerges from the COVID pandemic, large sector imbalances remain but in very different ways to the pre-COVID period. The private sector continues to disinvest, HHs remain uncertain and credit demand (ex-mortgages) remains subdued. UK HHs have built up c£160bn of excess savings during the pandemic but history suggests that (1) they take time to respond to shocks and (2) that unanticipated increases in wealth tend to be saved rather than spent.

The co-ordinated fiscal and monetary policy response to the pandemic was timely and appropriate but it remains premature to be discussing significant fiscal adjustments and/or an end to “bigger government”. Contrary to some of the current political rhetoric, budget outcomes are inappropriate goals in themselves. The correct budget outcome is the one that delivers a balanced economy, not a balanced budget.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“(Re-)fuelling challenges II”

Synchronised money cycles and messages from the UK and EA

The key chart

Broad money growth (% YoY) in UK and the euro area (Source: BoE, ECB; CMMP)

The key message

UK and euro area (EA) money cycles remain highly synchronised with the message from both region’s money sectors remaining one of “slowing momentum”.

At the start of 2021, I highlighted three key signals among these messages: are monthly HH deposit flows moderating; is consumer credit recovering; and are money and credit cycles re-synching with each other? The context here being that narrow money (M1) drove the expansion of broad money (M3) in both regions during the pandemic, reflecting the DEFLATIONARY forces of heightened uncertainty, increased (forced and precautionary) savings, reduced consumption and relatively subdued demand for credit.

While monthly flows of HH deposits are well below their respective peaks, they rose in both regions in August, notably in the UK where August’s flow was 2x pre-pandemic levels. Money sitting idly in overnight deposits contributes to neither growth nor inflation. Household uncertainly remains elevated and consumption muted (see also “Delaying the delayable”). Monthly consumer credit flows remain subdued in August and YoY growth rates were -2.4% in the UK and flat in the EA. Money and credit cycles remain out-of-synch with each other, presenting challenges to policy makers and investors alike and reminding us not to confuse current money cycles with previous versions. Furthermore, not only is private sector credit demand relatively subdued, it is also increasingly driven by FIRE-based lending (largely mortgages) rather than more productive COCO-based lending (largely NFC and consumer credit).

Economies and markets have benefitted from changing policy mixes that have been necessary and appropriate. Momentum in the key drivers of a sustained recovery is slowing, however, and further refuelling is required as we enter 4Q21.

Four charts that matter

Monthly HH deposit flows as a multiple of average 2019 monthly flows (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

While monthly flows of HH deposits are well below their respective peaks, they rose in both regions in August, notably in the UK where August’s flow was 2x pre-pandemic levels (see chart above). Money sitting idly in overnight deposits contributes to neither growth nor inflation. Household uncertainly remains elevated and consumption muted.

Annual growth in UK and EA consumer credit (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Monthly consumer credit flows remain subdued in August and YoY growth rates were -2.4% in the UK and flat in the EA (see chart above).

Lending growth minus money supply growth in the UK and EA (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Money and credit cycles remain out-of-synch with each other (see chart above), presenting challenges to policy makers and investors alike and reminding us not to confuse current money cycles with previous versions.

Growth rates in private sector credit by type (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Furthermore, not only is private sector credit demand relatively subdued, it is also increasingly driven by FIRE-based lending (largely mortgages) rather than more productive COCO-based lending (largely NFC credit and consumer credit).

Conclusion

Economies and markets have benefitted from changing policy mixes that have been necessary and appropriate. Momentum in the key drivers of a sustained recovery is slowing, however, and further refuelling is required as we enter 4Q21.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Delaying the delayable”

Faster indicators support a “slowing UK momentum” narrative

The key chart

Work-related and delayable card payments versus pre-pandemic levels (Source: ONS; CMMP)

The key message

UK households are delaying spending on so-called “delayable goods” such as clothing and furniture. This matters because this form of spending is a useful indicator of the extent to which the c. £150bn excess savings built up during the pandemic is returning to the UK economy via consumption in a sustained fashion.

Delayable purchases recovered strongly following the re-opening of non-essential stores (12 April) to reach 122% (19 April) and 112% (5 May) of pre-pandemic levels. The latest ONS data release indicates that they fell back to 86% of pre-pandemic levels in the week to 9 September 2021, however (see chart above).

While all forms of credit and debit card spending have recovered from their 2021 lows, only spending on staples and work-related purchases are above pre-pandemic levels (see chart below).

In short, households are spending more in returning to work but the wider message from faster-indicators supports a “slowing UK momentum” narrative.

Credit and debit card payments versus pre-pandemic levels by type (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Please note that the short summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately