cgmallin – Page 11 – Chris Mallin Macro Perspectives

“Challenging flawed narratives”

Four challenges to the “over-indebted US economy” narrative

The key chart

**Share of outstanding non-financial debt by sector** (Source: FED, CMMP)

The key message

The latest “Financial Accounts of the United States” published by The Federal Reserve at the end of last week challenges the popular, but flawed, narrative of an “over-indebted US economy”.

This narrative typically focuses on the outstanding stock of US nonfinancial debt, which hit another new high of $67.6 trillion at the end of 2Q22. Mistakenly, however, it ignores:

The significant shift away from private to public sector debt. The structure of US debt is now the mirror image of its pre-GFC structure following the shift away from relatively high-risk household (HH) debt towards lower-risk government debt (see key chart above)
The on-going, passive deleveraging of the HH sector. The HH debt ratio has fallen from its peak of 99% GDP at the end of 1Q08 to 75% at the end of 2Q22, very slightly above its post-GFC low
The relatively low levels of business (NFC) and HH indebtedness in a global context. The US is one of only three, BIS-reporting advanced economies with both NFC and HH debt ratios below the BIS threshold limits (above which debt becomes a constraint on future growth)
Key distinctions between public and private sector debt and their implications. Government debt represents financial wealth for the private sector, hence its position on the asset side of the private sector’s balance sheet. Furthermore, governments do not face the same constraints as the private sector. As a currency issuer, the US government cannot become insolvent in its own currency since it can always make payments as they come due in its own currency.

CMMP analysis believes that it is more accurate to view public sector debt as money in circulation rather than as debt in its more widely-held sense. In this context, “the idea of having to pay back money already in circulation [another feature of the flawed narrative] makes little sense.” (Alfonso, 2020. “Does the National Debt Matter?”)

Challenging flawed narratives

**Trend in outstanding stock of US non-financial debt in $ trillions** (Source: FED; CMMP)

According to the latest financial accounts, the outstanding stock of US nonfinancial debt reached $67.6 trillion at the end of June 2022 (see chart above).

Federal debt of $26.3 trillion accounted for 39% of total debt, followed by NFC debt of $19.5 trillion (29% total), HH debt of $18.6 trillion (27% total) and state and local debt of $3.3 trillion (5% total). The total debt ratio fell to 272% GDP, down from 307% GDP in 2Q20 at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The structure of US debt is now the mirror image of the structure that existed before the global financial crisis (GFC). At the end of 2Q07, HH debt accounted for 43% of outstanding nonfinancial debt, followed by NFC debt 30% and public sector debt (federal, state and local) 27%. Today (at the end of 2Q22), public sector debt accounts for 44% of outstanding debt, followed by NFC debt 29% and HH debt 27%. This represents a very significant structural shift away from relatively high-risk HH debt towards lower-risk government debt in the post-GFC period (see chart above).

**Trends in HH debt ($ tr) and the HH debt ratio (% GDP)** (Source: FED; CMMP)

The HH debt ratio has fallen from a peak of 99% GDP at the end of 1Q08 to 75% at the end of 2Q22 (see chart above). The peak level was 14ppt above the threshold level of 85% GDP above which debt is believed to be a constraint on future growth. The current level is slightly above its post-GFC low of 74% at the end of 4Q19.

The post-GFC period has been one of passive HH deleveraging.

**Trends in HH and NFC debt ratios** (Source: FED; CMMP)

The US is one of only three BIS-reporting advanced economies that has both HH and NFC debt below the maximum BIS threshold limits (along with Germany and Italy). The NFC debt ratio currently stands at 78% GDP, down from a recent high of 91% GDP at the end of 2Q20. For reference, the BIS maximum threshold limits for HH and NFC debt are 85% GDP and 90% GDP respectively (see chart above).

As shown in the chart below, the US private sector debt ratio of 153% GDP is now only slightly above the 145%-150% GDP range that characterised much of the past decade up until the COVID pandemic.

**Trends in private sector debt ratio (% GDP)** (Source: FED; CMMP)

Important distinctions exist between private sector and public sector debt, including:

While private sector debt is debt sitting on the liability side of the private sector’s balance sheet, government debt represents financial wealth for the private sector and sits on the asset side of the private sector’s balance sheet
As currency users, HHs and NFCs face obvious constraints on their levels of debt. “Taking on too much debt can, and does, lead to bankruptcy, foreclosure, and even incarceration” (Kelton, 2020)
In contrast, as a currency issuer, the US government cannot become insolvent in its own currency since it can always make payments as they come due in its own currency

CMMP analysis believes that it is more accurate to view public sector debt as money in circulation rather than as debt in its more widely-held sense. In this context, “the idea of having to pay back money already in circulation [another feature of the flawed narrative] makes little sense” (Alfonso, 2020. “Does the National Debt Matter?”).

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are abstracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Reallocating rather than reducing”

The impact of rising energy prices on UK spending

The key chart

**UK household card spending by type in relation to pre-pandemic levels** (Source: ONS; CMMP)

The key message

The message from the UK money sector remains one of resilient consumer spending, despite rising inflation and falling real incomes. UK households are reallocating their spending towards getting to work and staple items at the expense of spending on delayable goods and socialising, rather than reducing spending entirely. This matters because household spending accounts for 60p in every pound of UK output. The recent recovery in spending on delayable goods since mid-August is also a positive sign, although this key indicator of excess savings returning to the economy remains below pre-pandemic levels.

Re-allocating rather than reducing

In recent presentations on the outlook for UK and euro area household dynamics and consumer credit, I noted that households typically either reduce their spending and/or reallocate their spending in the face of rising energy prices. The latest ONS data on card payments suggests that UK households are still “re-allocating rather than reducing”. In other words, inflation and falling real incomes are affecting spending patterns more than overall spending levels, at least so far…

**Change (ppt) in card spending by type since 31 December 2021** (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Aggregate spending in the seven days to 1 September 2022 was the same as pre-pandemic levels (see key chart above) and 22ppt higher than at the end of December 2021 (see chart immediately above).
Spending across all categories – delayable, social, staple and work-related goods – has risen YTD most notably, if not unexpectedly, in the case of work-related spending.
Work related spending is currently 38ppt above pre-pandemic levels reflecting the impact of rising fuel prices. In contrast both spending on delayable goods such as clothing and furniture and on socialising remain below pre-pandemic levels.

**Trends in work-related spending and spending on delayables in relation to pre-pandemic levels** (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Please note that the summary comments and chart above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Three key aspects – reinforced!”

China data reinforces three key aspects of global debt dynamics

The key chart

**The chart from 2019 – China’s HH credit growth outstripping GDP growth despite the fact that the HH debt ratio was close to the average for all BIS reporting countries** (Source: BIS; CMMP)

The key message

This week’s news of weaker-than-expected economic growth in China and on-going challenges in the country’s property sector reinforces three key aspects of global debt dynamics:

Conventional macro thinking is flawed to the extent that it typically ignores the risks associated with private debt (while seeing government debt as a problem)
The “EM-debt” story has, for some time, been replaced by the “China-debt” story – strip out China and EM’s share of global debt is largely unchanged since the GFC
The level of any country’s debt needs to be considered in relation to its rate of growth (and its affordability and structure).

In an early 2019 CMMP Analysis report (“Too much, too soon?“), I concluded that:

“The risks associated with excess HH credit growth in China remain elevated and this analysis presents a relatively extreme example of the importance of considering the level of debt together with its rate of growth. History suggests that current trends in China are unsustainable. The most benign outcome is that the rate of growth in HH borrowing slows more rapidly with negative implications for consumption and aggregate demand. In short, China’s increasing HH debt burden represents a key headwind in the transition to a consumption-driven economy.”

Debt dynamics matter, a lot, but conventional approaches to understanding them need updating.

“The resilient UK consumer”

Inflation and falling real incomes affecting patterns more than levels of spending

The key chart

**Credit and debit card payments in relation to pre-pandemic levels** (Source: ONS; CMMP)

The key message

The message from the UK money sector is still one of resilient consumer spending, despite rising inflation and falling real incomes. Monthly spending on credit and debit cards in June 2022 was 1% above pre-pandemic levels and 6ppt above the level of monthly spending a year earlier.

UK households (HH) are increasing spending the most on getting to work and on staples. Spending on these categories was 32% and 13% above pre-pandemic levels in June 2022. Social spending was 1% above pre-pandemic levels, but spending on delayable goods such as clothing and furniture was still 16% below pre-pandemic levels.

Over the past 12 months, social spending and work-related spending have increased the most. Social spending has increases 18ppt from 83% pre-pandemic levels to 101% of pre-pandemic levels. Work related spending has increased 20ppt from 112% pre-pandemic levels to 132% pre-pandemic levels.

Delayable spending is the only spending category that (1) has fallen over the past twelve months and (2) remains below pre-pandemic levels. Delayable spending has fallen from 89% pre-pandemic levels in June 2021 to 84% pre-pandemic levels in June 2022. This matters because delayable spending is our preferred indictor regarding the extent to which excess savings are returning to the economy in a sustained fashion.

In short, the impact of rising inflation and falling real incomes is evident more on spending patterns than on the overall level of spending. UK HHs are increasing spending more on getting to work and on staples, unsurprisingly, and less on items such as clothing and furniture. Daily spending data through to 21 July 2022 is consistent with these monthly trends.

Please note that the summary comments and chart above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Still in-synch?”

Are the UK and EA money sectors still sending consistent messages?

The key chart

**Trends in UK and EA broad money** (Source: BOE; ECB, CMMP)

The key message

The messages from the UK and euro area (EA) money sectors were remarkably consistent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Are they still sending consistent messages now?

Growth in broad money rose sharply in both regions during the pandemic, peaking in 1Q21. Growth in narrow money (M1), and overnight deposits with banks within this, was the main driver of broad money growth. UK and EA households (HHs) were increasing savings and delaying consumption – deflationary rather than inflationary forces. Note, in this context, that growth in private sector credit (key assets of banks) did not match the growth in broad money (key ST liabilities of banks). Indeed the gap between money growth and lending growth reached historically high levels in 1Q21. These were atypical money and credit cycles.

Broad money growth has slowed down to pre-pandemic levels now. UK and EA HHs are no longer hoarding cash. The demand for consumer credit has recovered with the largest quarterly flows since the recovery began in 2Q21. Consumer credit demand has returned to pre-pandemic levels in the UK but has still to recover fully in the EA. Growth rates in money supply and private sector credit have also re-aligned as money and credit cycles have re-synched with each other. In the EA, lending growth exceeded money supply growth in June 2022 for the first time since October 2011. The contribution of productive COCO-based lending has also increased in both regions. In the EA, for example, NFC lending grew faster than mortgages in June 2022.

In short, the key signals that I have been following consistently since early 2021 are all sending broadly positive messages for the economic outlook in both the UK and EA. The money sectors are still sending consistent messages, albeit with slightly different areas of emphasis.

The UK is more geared towards a recovery in consumer credit and has benefited from a stronger recovery here. Overall credit growth is slowing in the UK, however. The EA has seen a more promising recovery in lending to NFC and credit growth is still accelerating (in nominal terms).

As highlighted in the previous two posts, rising inflation has overshadowed all of these positive developments in the EA and the UK, however. Credit growth is negative in real terms in both regions, and leading, coincident and lagging monetary indicators are slowing sharply and in a coordinated fashion.

The synchronisation in the messages from the UK and EA money sectors extends to both the good and the bad news. Plenty for optimists and pessimists to debate here…

Still in-synch?

The messages from the UK and euro area (EA) money sectors were remarkably consistent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Are they still sending consistent messages now?

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

**The impact of COVID-19 on UK and EA broad money growth** (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Growth in broad money rose sharply in both regions to peak in 1Q21 (see chart above). In the UK, the YoY growth rate in M4ex rose from 7.5% in March 2020 to a peak of 15.4% in February 2021. In the EA, the growth rate in M3 rose from 7.5% in March 2020 to a peak of 12.5% one month earlier in January 12.5%.

**Narrow money as %age of broad money in the UK and EA** (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Growth in narrow money (M1), and overnight deposits with banks within this, was the main driver of broad money growth. M1 currently accounts for 69% of UK M3 and 73% of EA M3, up from 48% and 51% respectively a decade earlier. This means that UK and EA households (HHs) were increasing savings and delaying consumption during the pandemic – deflationary rather than inflationary forces.

Put simply, money sitting idly in bank deposits contributes to neither growth nor inflation.

**The gap between UK and EA lending and money supply growth** (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Note that the growth in broad money (bank’s ST liabilities) was not matched by growth in private sector credit (banks’ assets). Indeed the gap between growth in money and growth in lending reached historic highs in 1Q21. In short, the money and credit cycles had moved out-of-synch with each other, and to a record extent.

The recovery from COVID-19

Broad money growth has slowed down to pre-pandemic levels now (see chart above). In June 2022, growth in M4ex had slowed to 4.4% in the UK and growth in M3 had slowed to 5.7% in the EA. These represent the slowest rates of growth since January 2020 and February 2020 respectively.

**Monthly HH money flows as a multiple of pre-pandemic average flows** (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

HHs are no longer hoarding cash. In the UK, monthly HH money flows fell to £1.5bn in June 2022, 0.3x the average pre-pandemic flow of £4.7bn. In the EA, monthly HH deposit flows fell to €8.5bn, again this is 0.3x the average pre-pandemic flow of €33bn (see chart above).

**Quarterly consumer credit flows** (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

The demand for consumer credit has recovered with the largest quarterly flows since the recovery began in 2Q21. At the peak of the crisis in 2Q20, UK and EA HHs repaid £13.2bn and €12.9bn in consumer credit respectively. More recently, we have seen five consecutive quarters of positive consumer credit flows (see chart above).

Consumer credit demand has returned to pre-pandemic levels in the UK but has still to recover fully in the EA. In the 2Q22, UK consumer credit flows recovered to £4.2bn, above the pre-pandemic average of £3.6bn. EA consumer credit flows also recovered to €7.5bn, but they remain below the pre-pandemic average of €10.8bn.

**Annual growth rates in UK and EA consumer credit** (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Annual growth rates in consumer credit have also recovered to post-pandemic highs, to 6.5% in the UK and 3.3% in the EA in June 2022. Note the relative gearing of the UK here (see chart above). Consumer credit growth slowed faster and recovered stronger in the UK than in the EA.

**Trends in the gap between UK and EA lending and money supply growth**
(Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Growth rates in money supply and private sector credit have also re-aligned as money and credit cycles have re-synched with each other (see chart above). In the EA, lending growth exceeded money supply growth in June 2022 for the first time since October 2011. In the UK, lending growth still lagged money supply growth by 2.1ppt in June 2022, but this is much narrower than the peak gap of 11.5ppt seen in February 2021.

**Trends in UK and EA bank lending by type** (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

The contribution of productive COCO-based lending has increased in both regions. In the EA, NFC lending grew faster (5.9%) than mortgages (5.3%) in June 2022. Less productive, mortgage lending remains resilient in the EA, but its growth is slowing in the UK (see chart above).

Conclusion

In short, the key signals that I have been following consistently since early 2021 are all sending broadly positive messages for the economic outlook in both the UK and EA. The UK has benefited from a stronger recovery in consumer credit. The EA has seen a more promising recovery in lending to NFC.

As highlighted in the previous two posts, rising inflation has overshadowed all of these positive developments, however (see “Accounting for inflation” and “Accounting for inflation – part 2”). Credit growth is negative in real terms in both the UK and EA, and leading, coincident and lagging monetary indicators are slowing sharply and in a coordinated fashion.

The synchronisation in the messages from the UK and EA money sectors extends to both the good and the bad news. Plenty for optimists and pessimists to debate here…

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Accounting for inflation – part 2”

Inflation also distorts the 2Q22 message from the UK money sector

The key chart

**Nominal and real growth rates in UK M4Lex** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

The key message

In my previous post, I explained how rising inflation distorts the 2Q22 messages from the euro area’s (EAs) money sector significantly. The same is true for the UK too.

Ignore inflation and the messages from the UK’s money sector are broadly positive for the economic outlook. The three key signals from the UK money sector that I have been following consistently since early 2021 are all sending broadly positive messages – UK HHs have stopped hoarding money, they are borrowing more to fund consumption, and money and credit cycles are re-synching. Growth rates in COCO-based consumer credit and NFC lending are also rising in the UK while the growth in FIRE-based mortgage lending is slowing. Does this sound familiar?

Rising inflation is over-taking these positive trends, however. Lending to private sector companies and households (M4Lex) is falling sharply in real terms (-6.5% YoY). Trends in real HH credit and real NFC credit are slowing sharply and in a coordinated fashion. This matters because these factors typically display coincident and lagging relationships with real GDP.

As in the EA, plenty of information for optimists and pessimists to debate here but with increasing ammunition for the pessimists…

Accounting for inflation – part 2

In the previous post, I explained how rising inflation distorts the 2Q22 messages from the euro area’s (EAs) money sector significantly. The same is true for the UK too.

The good news

Ignore inflation and the messages from the UK’s money sector are broadly positive for the economic outlook.

**Trends in monthly HH money flows** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

Monthly HH money flows have moderated slowly, reflecting lower levels of uncertainty. The monthly flow fell from £5.2bn in May 2022 to £1.5bn in June 2022. This is well below the average pre-pandemic flows of £4.6bn and the peak flow of £26bn recorded in May 2020 when HH uncertainty levels peaked at the height of the pandemic crisis (see chart above).

**Quarterly trends in HH money flows** (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The quarterly HH money flow in 2Q22 was £12.2bn (see chart above). This compares with the average pre-pandemic flows of £11.7bn. The message here is the same – HHs in the UK are no longer hoarding cash in the form of bank deposits. This is reflected, in turn, in the slowdown in broad money growth (see below).

**Trends in monthly consumer credit flows** (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The demand for credit has recovered. Monthly consumer credit flows rose to £1.8bn in June 2022 from £0.9bn in May 2022, well above the pre-pandemic average flows of £1bn. The YoY growth rate of 6.5% was the highest rate of growth since May 2019. Within this, the annual growth rate of credit card borrowing was 12.5% while other forms of consumer credit grew 4.1%. These were the highest rates of growth since November 2005 and March 2020 respectively.

**Quarterly trends in consumer credit** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

The quarterly flow of consumer credit rose from £3.1bn in 4Q21 and £3.6bn in 1Q21 to £4.2bn in 2Q22 (see chart above). The 2Q22 flow was the largest quarterly flow since 2Q18 and was above the pre-pandemic average of £3.6bn. There have now been five consecutive quarters of positive consumer credit flows, with current flows in-line or slightly above pre-pandemic levels.

**Growth trends in broad money (M4ex) and lending (M4Lex)** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

After the recent and unprecedented de-synchronisation of money and credit cycles, growth rates in UK money supply and private sector credit are converging (see chart above). The YoY growth rate in money (M4ex) slowed from 5.4% in May 2022 to 4.4% in June 2022. At the same time, the YoY growth rate in lending (M4Lex) fell from 3.9% to 2.3%. While the gap between the two growth rates widened slightly from 1.5ppt to 2.1ppt, it has narrowed considerably from its peak of 11.5ppt in February 2021.

**Growth trends in mortgages, consumer credit and NFC lending** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

Growth rates in COCO-based consumer credit and NFC lending are rising in the UK while the growth in FIRE-based mortgage lending is slowing (see chart above).

As described above, consumer credit is growing at the fastest rate since May 2019. NFC lending has also recovered to 2.0% YoY, marking five consecutive months of positive YoY growth.

Of course, mortgages remain the largest segment of UK private sector credit (89% of total HH credit and 61% of total PSC). The relative stability of mortgage demand has been a key feature of the messages from the UM money sector for some time. However, net borrowing of mortgage debt decreased from £8.0bn in May 2022 to £5.3bn in June 2022. The YoY growth rate also declined from 4.6% in May 2022 to 3.8% in June 2022, the slowest rate of growth since February 2021. Approvals for house purchases, an indicator of future borrowing, decreased to 63.700 in June 2022 from 65,700 in May. This is below the pre-pandemic average of 66,700.

The bad news

Take inflation into account and the messages are very different, however. Lending to private sector companies and HHs (M4Lex) slowed from 3.9% YoY in May 2022 to 2.3% YoY in June 2022 (see chart above). In real terms, M4Lex fell -6.5% YoY in June 2020, with all forms of lending declining in real terms.

**Growth trends (real terms) in HH and NFC credit** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

Furthermore, trends in real HH credit and real NFC credit are slowing sharply in a coordinated manner. This matters because these factors typically display coincident and lagging relationships with real GDP over time (see “Look beyond the yield curve” for more details).

Conclusion

The three key signals from the UK money sector that we have been following consistently since early 2021 are all sending broadly positive messages – UK HHs have stopped hoarding money, they are borrowing more to fund consumption, and money and credit cycles are re-synching. Growth rates in COCO-based consumer credit and NFC lending are also rising in the UK while the growth in FIRE-based mortgage lending is slowing.

Rising inflation is over-taking these positive trends, however. Lending to private sector companies and households (M4Lex) is falling sharply in real terms (-6.5% YoY) and traditional coincident and lagging monetary indicators have turned down sharply and in a coordinated fashion. Plenty of ammunition here for pessimists.

The format and presentation of this post mirrors that of the previous post deliberately. Why? Because the messages from the UK and EA money sectors have been very similar during the pandemic. The next post will compare and contrast these trends more closely.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Accounting for inflation”

Inflation distorts the 2Q22 messages from the money sector

The key chart

**Nominal and real growth rates in EA private sector credit** (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The key message

Rising inflation distorts the 2Q22 messages from the euro area’s (EAs) money sector significantly.

Ignore inflation and the three key signals that I have been following consistently since early 2021 are all sending broadly positive messages for the region’s economic outlook. Monthly household (HH) deposit flows have moderated sharply, reflecting lower levels of uncertainty. The demand for consumer credit has recovered with the largest quarterly flows since the recovery began in 2Q21. Growth rates in money supply and private sector credit have also re-aligned as money and credit cycles have re-synched with each other. Finally, the contribution of productive COCO-based lending has increased, with growth in lending to corporates (NFCs) outstripping mortgage growth in June 2022. So far, so good.

Take inflation into account and the messages are very different, however. Private sector credit (PSC) is slowing in real terms (-2.3% YoY). With the exception of lending to non-monetary financial corporations (8% of total PSC), the growth rates in all forms of PSC are declining in real terms. Furthermore, trends in real M1, real HH credit and real NFC credit are all slowing sharply in a coordinated manner. This matters because these factors typically display leading, coincident and lagging relationships with real GDP.

Plenty of information for optimists and pessimists to debate but with increasing ammunition for the pessimists…

Accounting for inflation

Rising inflation distorts the 2Q22 messages from the euro area’s (EAS) money sector significantly.

The good news

Ignore inflation and the messages are broadly positive for the region’s economic outlook.

**Trends in monthly HH deposit flows** (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Monthly HH deposit flows have moderated sharply, reflecting lower levels of uncertainty. The monthly flow fell to €9bn in June 2022 (see chart above). This is well below the average pre-pandemic flows of €33bn and the peak flow of €78bn in April 2020 when HH uncertainty levels peaked at the height of the pandemic crisis.

**Quarterly trends in HH deposit flows** (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The quarterly HH deposit flow in the 2Q22 was €53bn (see chart above). This compares with average quarterly pre-pandemic flows of €90bn. The message here is the same – HHs in the EA are no longer hoarding cash in the form of bank deposits. This is reflected, in turn, in the slowdown in broad money growth (see below).

The demand for consumer credit has recovered. Monthly consumer credit flows slowed from €2.4bn in April 2022 and €3.3bn in May 2022 to €1.8bn in June 2022 (see chart above). The YoY growth rate of 3.3% was the second highest rate of growth since consumer credit recovered in April 2021, however (after May 2022’s 3.4% YoY).

**Quarterly trends in consumer credit** (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The quarterly flow of consumer credit in 2Q22 of €7bn was the largest quarterly flow since the recovery started in 2Q21. There have now been five consecutive quarters of positive consumer credit flows (see chart above), albeit these flows remain below the pre-pandemic levels.

**Growth trends in broad money (M3) and private sector credit** (Source: ECB; CMMP)

After the recent unprecedented de-synchronisation of money and credit cycles, growth rates in EA money supply and private sector credit have now converged (see chart above).

The YoY growth rate in broad money (M3) fell to 5.7% in June 2022, the slowest rate of growth since February 2020. In contrast, the growth rate in private sector credit rose to 6.1% YoY, the fastest rate of growth since private sector credit growth turned positive in Mach 2015.

Recall that in January 2021, the gap between the growth rate in M3 and the growth rate in private sector credit was 8ppt. In June 2022, private sector credit grew faster than broad money, suggesting that the period of excess liquidity (see green shaded area in graph above) may be ending.

**Trends in PSC and contribution from COCO-based lending** (Source: ECB, CMMP)

The contribution of productive COCO-based lending is also increasing with the growth in lending to corporates (NFCs) outstripping the growth in mortgages. COCO-based lending contributed 2.5ppt to the total (unadjusted) growth rate in private sector credit of 5.8% (see chart above). This compares with a contribution of only 0.6ppt a year earlier.

Less productive FIRE-based lending is still contributing more (3.3ppt) than COCO-based lending to total loan growth, but corporate lending is now growing faster (5.9% YoY) than mortgage lending (5.3% YoY). Corporate and mortgage lending represent the largest segments of COCO-based and FIRE-based lending respectively.

**Growth trends (% YoY, nominal) in mortgages and NFC lending** (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The bad news

Take inflation into account and the messages are very different, however. PSC is growing 6.1% YoY in nominal terms, the fastest rate of growth since January 2009. In real terms, however, PSC is falling -2.3% YoY. With the exception of lending to non-monetary financial corporations (8% of total PSC), the growth rates in all forms of PSC are declining in real terms.

**Growth trends (% YoY, real terms) in M1, HH credit and NFC credit** (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Furthermore, trends in real M1, real HH credit and real NFC credit are all slowing sharply in a coordinated manner. This matters because these factors typically display leading, coincident and lagging relationships with real GDP over time. (See “Look beyond the yield curve” for more details about these indicators)

Conclusion

The three key signals from the money sector that we have been following consistently since early 2021 are all sending broadly positive messages – HHs have stopped hoarding money, they are borrowing more to fund consumption, and money and credit cycles are re-synching. The on-going recovery in productive COCO-based lending is also positive.

Rising inflation is over-taking these positive trends, however. PSC is falling in real terms and traditional leading, coincident and lagging monetary indicators have turned down sharply and in a coordinated fashion. Plenty of ammunition here for pessimists…

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Financial inequality and debt vulnerability”

The BoE introduces an improved measure of affordability

The key chart

**Share of outstanding mortgages and consumer credit by income decile** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

The key message

Rising financial inequality means that lower-income HHs have less flexibility to adjust their spending in response to rising prices and are less likely to have a cushion of savings to protect them. But what does this mean for debt vulnerability in the UK, given that lower-income HHs also hold a relatively small share of outstanding mortgages and consumer credit?

In its latest “Financial Stability Review” (5 July 2022), the Bank of England introduced a new measure of HH debt affordability that takes account of these factors to deliver an improved assessment of HH vulnerability to rising prices and higher interest rates. The key points are:

The share of HHs with high, adjusted debt service ratios (DSRs) i.e. those who are typically more likely to struggle with repayments, is currently in-line with historic averages and well below pre-GFC peaks
The BoE believes that this share is unlikely to rise substantially in 2022. Further fiscal measures will cushion serviceability this year and the shift towards fixed mortgages (80% outstanding stock) delays the pass through effect of higher rates
Looking forward, the BoE expects this share to increase above its historic average in 2023, but to remain “significantly below the peaks seen ahead of the GFC.”

[In response to questions, Sir Jon Cunliffe, the Deputy Governor for Financial Stability, indicated that rates would have to rise significantly (200-500bp) above current market expectations for the bank rate (3.0%) for the share to reach previous highs.]

The obvious risks to this positive assessment, acknowledged by the BOE, include weaker growth, higher unemployment, persistent inflation, higher rates etc.

In the context of the recent deterioration in the net lending position of the HH sector, the risk that HHs may increasing their borrowing in order to fund rising living costs also remains important.

Financial inequality and debt vulnerability

What is the impact of financial inequality on household (HH) debt vulnerability?

Financial inequality means that lower-income HHs have less flexibility to adjust their spending in response to rising prices and are less likely to have a cushion of savings to protect them.

**Share of income spent on taxes and essentials by gross income decile** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

The share of income spent on essentials and taxes varies considerably across the UK income distribution (see chart above). HHs in the lowest income decile, for example, spend 94% of their gross income on taxes and essentials. In contrast, HHs in the highest income decile spend only 47% of their gross income on taxes and essentials. This means that lower-income HHs have much less freedom to change their behaviour in response to rising inflation.

**HH savings ratio (%) broken down by gross income decile** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

The savings ratio of lower-income HHs is also much lower than the savings ratio of higher-income HHs (see chart above). HHs in the bottom three income deciles save less than 6% of their gross income. This contrasts with HHs in the top two income deciles who save more than 30% of their gross income.

Obviously, this means that lower-income HHs are much less likely to have a savings cushion than can protect against rising prices. ( Note also that the COVID-19 pandemic led to a further widening of the savings disparity in the UK, as noted in previous posts.)

That said, lower income HHs are also likely to hold a smaller share of both outstanding mortgages and consumer credit (see chart above).

**Share of outstanding mortgages by income decile** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

The bottom three income deciles account for 1.6%, 1.2% and 2.3% of total outstanding mortgages respectively, a cumulative market share of just over 5% (see chart above). The top income decile accounts for 33% of total mortgages alone and the top three income deciles together account for more than two-thirds of total mortgages.

The breakdown of consumer credit follows a similar, if less extreme, pattern. The bottom three income deciles account for 1.5%, 3.0% and 4.0% respectively, a cumulative market share of just over 8% (see chart below). The top income decile accounts for 20% of total consumer credit alone and the top three income deciles accounts for more than half of total consumer credit.

**Share of outstanding consumer credit by income decile** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

In its latest “Financial Stability Review”, the Bank of England introduces a new measure of HH debt affordability that takes account of these factors to deliver an improved assessment of the HH vulnerability to rising prices and higher interest rates.

The BoE claims that, “the share of HHs with high cost of living adjusted DSRs on either their mortgage or consumer credit has remained significantly below the pre-GFC peaks over the past few years.”

**Share of HHs with high adjusted DSR on mortgage debt** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

In the case of mortgages, the BoE estimates that 1.7% of HHs had a high, adjusted DSR at the end of 1Q22, up from 1.4% in 1Q20. This is close to the historic average but below the pre-GFC peak of 2.8% (see chart above). The BoE is expecting this share to remain at around the current level for the rest of 2022. This assumes that government support measures will relieve the pressure of rising living costs and also reflects the fact that 80% of outstanding mortgages are fixed rate now versus 55% five years ago.

**Share of HHs with high adjusted DSR on consumer credit** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

The story for consumer credit is much the same. The share of high, adjusted DSRs for consumer credit was 6.4% in 1Q22, up from 5.5% in 1Q20. This is also well below the pre-GFC peak of 9.5%. Again, the BOE is not expecting a major change here during the rest of 2022.

Looking slightly further ahead, the BoE believes that the shares of HHs with a high, adjusted DSR for both mortgages and consumer credit will increase in 2023, but “would remain significantly below the peaks seen ahead of the GFC.”

In response to questions, Sir Jon Cunliffe, the Deputy Governor for Financial Stability, indicated that rates would have to rise significantly (200-500bp) above current market expectations for the bank rate (3.0%) for the share to reach previous highs.

The obvious risks to this positive assessment, acknowledged by the BOE, include weaker growth, higher unemployment, persistent inflation, higher rates etc. In the context of the recent deterioration in the net lending position of the HH sector, the risk that HHs may increasing their borrowing in order to fund rising living costs also remains important.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are abstracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Don’t be surprised – part 2”

Short-term comfort but more serious medium-term concerns

The key chart

**UK net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) by sector from the capital account as % age of GDP**
(Source: ONS; CMMP)

The key message

Two official UK data points released last week – the 1Q22 household (HHs) savings ratio and May 2022’s consumer credit growth – provide short-term comfort but may hide more serious medium-term concerns for the UK economic outlook.

The positive news: HHs have room to adjust to falling real incomes by running down savings and increasing borrowings further. The adjustment process here remains at an early stage (see “Don’t be surprised”).

The negative news: while the net lending position of the HH sector widened slightly in 1Q21 (0.9% GDP), the UK private sector, in aggregate, moved into a net borrowing position (-1.4% GDP). At the same time, the public sector increased its net borrowing position further (-6.7% GDP).

So what? The irony of post-Brexit Britain, is that the economy is currently more dependent than ever on the net lending of the RoW. The challenges of the pre-Covid period have returned already – twin domestic deficits counterbalanced by significant (and persistent?) current account deficits.

These trends are not unexpected but that does not mean that they are either welcome or sustainable.

Don’t be surprised – part 2

Two official UK data points released last week – the 1Q22 HHs savings ratio and May 2022’s consumer credit growth – provide short-term comfort but medium-term concerns for the UK economic outlook.

**Real HH disposable income growth (% QoQ)** (Source: ONS; CMMP)

The context here is that real HH disposable income has fallen for four consecutive quarters (see chart above). Official forecasts suggest that this will continue for the rest of 2022 and in 2023.

In response, the same forecasts assume that HHs will reduce their savings ratio to a new low in 1Q23 by running down the excess savings built up during the pandemic (see chart below) and/or by increasing their borrowing. The positive news is that this process has hardly begun.

**Trends in HH savings ratio** (Source: ONS; OBR; CMMP)

The 1Q22 HH savings ratio was 6.8%, unchanged from the 4Q21 and above the OBR’s forecast of 6.3% (see chart above). Of course, this represents a large decline from the 2Q20 peak of 23.9%, but the 1Q22 ratio is only slightly below the 20-year average of 7.1%. (Note that the OBR expects the savings ratio to fall further to 2.8% in 1Q23.)

**Monthly HH money flows as a multiple of pre-pandemic flows** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

Furthermore, while monthly HH money flows have moderated sharply, they remain slightly above pre-pandemic levels during 2Q22 (see chart above). The result? Rather than declining, the stock of excess savings is increasingly slightly still (see chart below). CMMP analysis estimated that excess savings currently total £167bn.

**CMMP estimates for build up of excess savings** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

As an aside, the ONS also released the results of its modelling of the breakdown of the excess savings last week. The modelling suggests that so-called “forced savings” accounted for 75% of the increase in HH savings during the pandemic.

**Estimates for excess savings broken down by type** (Source: BoE; ONS; CMMP)

According to their calculation, this amounts to over £140bn, or around 10% of annual disposable income. This matters because forced savings are typically released relatively quickly to support economic activity (see “Forced versus precautionary”).

**Monthly flows (£bn) and YoY growth rates in consumer credit** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

Consumer credit grew 5.7% YoY in May 2022, unchanged versus the previous month (see chart above). This is the fastest rate of growth since February 2020 (5.8%) due in part to base effects. The monthly flow of consumer credit in May 2022 fell, however, from £2.0bn in February, £1.3bn in March, and £1.4bn in April 2022 to £0.8bn. May’s monthly flow is also below the pre-pandemic average of £1.1bn.

**HH debt to income ratio (%)** (Source: ONS; CMMP)

In other words, the demand for consumer credit has recovered – a welcome trend – but is not increasing at a rate that would suggest significant levels of distressed borrowing. HH debt as a percentage of disposable income, while elevated in absolute terms, has remained relatively stable since 2015 and below the peaks seen in the built up to the GFC.

So far, so good. Recent trends reflect a return to normality and suggest that HHs still have room to adjust to falling real incomes. It is not all good news, however. In “Don’t be surprised”, I highlighted the negative implications of forecast trends for both financial equality and economic sustainability. Last week’s data also shines further light on question of economic sustainability.

**HH net lending/borrowing (% GDP)** (Source: ONS; CMMP)

The net lending of the UK HH sector, i.e. the surplus resources that the HH sector makes available to other sectors, rose from 0.6% GDP in 4Q21 to 0.9% GDP in 1Q22 (see chart above). However, the UK private sector in aggregate shifted from a net lending position of 4.3% GDP in 4Q21 to a net borrowing position of 1.4% of GDP.

When combined with the net borrowing of the UK public sector of 6.7% in 1Q22, the UK’s net borrowing position with the rest of the world increased to 8.4% GDP (see chart below).

The irony of post-Brexit Britain, is that the 1Q22 net borrowing position with the rest of the world exceeds the previous highest borrowing seen in 4Q201 (7.0% GDP).

With both domestic sectors currently running net borrowing positions, the UK is more dependent than ever on net lending from the RoW (see chart above).

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are abstracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Anatomy of a currency crisis!?!”

…or the risks of USD dollar-centricity in financial/economic reporting

The key chart

**Sterling effective exchange rate** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

The key message

I posted a comment on LinkedIn last week about a so-called “basket-case” currency that is currently trading above its five-year average levels despite a host of negative economic, political and market-related factors.

The currency in question was the pound sterling and the graph illustrated the narrow version of the sterling exchange rate index (ERI) as calculated and published daily by the Bank of England (see key chart above).

The “tongue-in-cheek” post reflected an increasing frustration with excessive USD dollar-centricity in current financial and economic reporting.

**USD – Sterling exchange rate** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

Trends in bilateral exchange rates such as USD to sterling are important, of course, The US is the UK’s largest individual trading partner after all, and sterling is currently trading 7% below its five-year average versus the USD (see chart above). This is noteworthy in itself.

**Sterling ERI weights** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

That said, the UK economy is affected by (and reflected in) movements in sterling against many different currencies. As a bloc, the EU is the UK’s largest trading partner, for example. The region accounts for roughly double the US’s share of UK trade (see chart above). Sterling is currently trading 2% ABOVE is five-year average versus the EURO (see chart below), which helps to explain the trend in sterling’s ERI illustrated above (see key chart).

**EURO – Sterling exchange rate** (Source: BoE; CMMP)

This is not to deny that sterling is trending weaker, increasing the risk of imported inflation in the process. The sterling ERI has fallen 4% YTD. But, for a UK-audience at least, it is helpful to explore the extent to which reported trends in the bilateral exchange rate with the US are a reflection of USD strength as opposed to sterling weakness.

Perhaps the more important question, is why is sterling actually not trading much weaker than it is now?

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are abstracts from more detailed analysis that is availability separately.