“Sonnez l’alarme?”

Where are the “real risks” in French debt dynamics?

The key chart

Trends in French debt ($bn) broken down by sector (Source: BIS; CMMP)

The key message

France’s state auditor, the Cour des Comptes, “sounded the alarm” about the impact of pandemic spending on France’s widening budget deficit and rising government debt levels last week. The auditor also raised concerns about potential risks to the cohesion of the EA. Are these concerns justified or do greater risks lie elsewhere within French debt dynamics?

The auditor is correct to highlight the impact of pandemic spending on the government’s net borrowing. This rose from 78bn in 3Q19 to €220bn in 3Q21. The level of government debt and the debt ratio are close to their record 1Q21 highs. The debt ratio has remained above the EA’s 60% GDP threshold for the past two decades and the divergence in the debt ratios of France and Germany in the post-GFC period represents a “potential risk to the cohesion of the EA”.

The first counter argument, based on national accounting principles, is that the correct level of government net borrowing is the one that balances the economy not the budget. The level of private sector net lending rose from €75bn in 3Q19 to €225bn in 3Q21, driven largely by HH net savings of €134bn. In other words, the net borrowing of the government was a necessary, timely and appropriate response to the scale of the private sector’s net lending/disinvestment.

The second counter argument is that that while the outstanding stock of French government debt may be the fourth highest in the world, France ranks lower in terms of government indebtedness. This argument will be more compelling to those who view debt sustainability (correctly) as a flow concept, but much less compelling to those who prefer the traditional stock-based approach.

From a risk and financial stability perspective, we are more concerned about France’s private sector debt dynamics, particularly in the NFC sector. France has relatively high exposure to the NFC sector, the fifth most indebted NFC sector globally. In spite of this, France has seen the third highest rate of excess NFC credit growth globally over the past three years. Affordability risks in the NFC sector are also elevated in absolute terms and in relation to historic trends. While the level of HH indebtedness in France is low in absolute terms, the risks associated with excess HH credit growth and affordability are elevated in this sector too.

The headlines resulting from the Cour des Comptes’ report support our wider hypothesis that conventional macro thinking is flawed to the extent that it typically ignores private debt while seeing government debt as a problem rather than as a solution.

Sonnez l’alarme?

France’s state auditor, the Cour des Comptes, “sounded the alarm” about the impact of pandemic spending on the widening budget deficit and level of government debt in its 2022 Annual Report published on 16 February 2022. The auditor also argued that the government should revise its deficit reduction plans after April’s presidential election, claiming that current plans risk fuelling divergences within the euro area, especially with more fiscally conservative countries such as Germany.

The supporting evidence

Trend in government net borrowing over the past twenty years (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The state auditor is correct to highlight the impact of pandemic spending on the budget deficit. As illustrated in the chart above, the government’s net borrowing rose from €78bn in 3Q19 to €220bn in 3Q21. The current level of net borrowing is also higher than the previous peak net borrowing of €143bn in the aftermath of the GFC. Viewed in isolation, this is a scary chart!

Trends in government debt and debt ratios over the past twenty years (Source: BIS; CMMP)

The level of government debt and the debt ratio are also close to their all-time highs (see chart above). The outstanding stock of government debt rose form €2,727bn in 2Q19 to €3,088bn in 2Q21, slightly below the peak 1Q21 level of €3,099bn. The government debt ratio (the blue line above) rose from 113% GDP in 2Q19 to 128% GDP in 2Q21. Again, the debt ratio also peaked at 134% GDP in 1Q21. Note that throughout the past two decades, France’s government debt ratio has exceeded the EA’s threshold of 60% GDP.

Trends in French and German government debt ratios (Source: BIS; CMMP)

The debt ratios of France and Germany have been on different trajectories for most of the post-GFC period. The German government debt ratio peaked at 86% GDP in 4Q12 and declined to a recent low of 64% GDP in 4Q19 (still above the EA’s threshold level). So again, the auditor is correct to highlight this as a “potential” source of risk to the cohesion of the EA.

The counter arguments

The first counter argument here is a simple one – the correct level of government net borrowing is the one that balances the economy not the budget. It is a basic principle of national accounting that the net borrowing of one economic sector (in this case the French government), must be equal to net lending of one or other economic sector(s) (see “Everyone has one”).

Private sector net lending versus public sector net borrowing (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The chart above plots the net lending of the private sector and the net borrowing of the public sector together. The level of private sector net lending, or disinvestment (the blue area), rose from €75bn in 3Q19 to €225bn in 3Q21, driven largely by HH net savings of €134bn and FI net savings of €125bn.

In other words, the increase in the government’s net borrowing position essentially matched the increase in the private sector’s net lending position. Rather than a source of alarm, the spending response of the French government was necessary, timely and appropriate.

The second counter-argument is that while, the outstanding stock of French government debt may be the fourth highest in the world, France is ranked lower in terms of government indebtedness (with a debt ratio similar to the UK).

Top 10 BIS reporting economies ranked by total government debt (EURbn) (Source: BIS; CMMP)

The chart above ranks the top ten BIS reporting countries in terms of outstanding government debt. Total government debt was $3,670bn at the end of 2Q21, representing a 4% share of global government debt after the US (33%), Japan (14%) and the UK (5%). The chart below ranks the top ten BIS reporting countries in terms of the government debt ratio. In this case, France’s ranking drops to #8 globally and #7 in Europe after Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Belgium and the UK.

Top 10 BIS reporting economies ranked by government debt ratio (% GDP) (Source: BIS; CMMP)

This second counter-argument will be less persuasive for those who view debt sustainability as a stock concept (the traditional approach). They will point to the fact that France’s government debt ratio is not only above the EA average, but it is also above the (largely arbitrarily chosen) 60% or 90% thresholds. CMMP analysis, which is centred on the sector balances framework, considers both fiscal space and debt sustainability as flow concepts and for reasons mentioned above (and possibly in future posts) is less concerned here.

What about private sector debt dynamics?

From a risk and financial stability perspective, we are more concerned about France’s private sector debt dynamics, particularly in the NFC sector.

Trends in the breakdown of French and EA debt (Source: BIS; CMMP)

France has a relatively high exposure to NFC debt. At the end of 2Q21, NFC debt accounted for 46% of total debt. This is down from 50% at the time of the GFC (see chart above) but remains above the aggregate shares of 32% and 39% for advanced and EA economies respectively. Why does this matter?

Top 10 BIS reporting economies ranked by NFC debt ratio (% GDP) (Source: BIS; CMMP)

France’s NFC sector is the fifth most indebted NFC sector among BIS economies. At the end of 2Q21, the NFC debt ratio was 170% GDP, after Luxembourg (322%), Hong Kong (304%), Sweden (179%) and Ireland (171%). The French NFC debt ratio is well above the 111% GDP and 98% GDP aggregate for all advanced and EA economies respectively and the 90% threshold level above which the BIS considers debt to be a drag on future growth.

Excess NFC credit growth plotted against NFC debt ratios (Source: BIS; CMMP)

In spite of the high level of NFC indebtedness, France has seen the third highest levels of excess NFC credit growth over the past three years (see chart above). The NFC sector’s RGF was 4.8% in 2Q21, after Switzerland (6.7%) and Japan (6.6%). The rate of excess NFC credit growth was well above the EA average of 1.8% and higher than the 3.0% average for all advanced economies. Risks are clearly elevated when excess rates of credit growth combine with high levels of indebtedness, as is the case here (for an explanation of the RGF framework see here.)

Trends in NFC debt service ratio (Source: BIS; CMMP)

The NFC debt service ratio (DSR) is also high in absolute terms and above its respective LT average despite the low absolute cost of NFC borrowing. As at the end of 2Q21, the DSR was 60%, 9ppt above its LT average of 51% (see chart above). France is one of four advanced economies where the DSRs are high in both absolute terms and in relation to LT averages, along with Sweden, Canada, and Norway (see chart below).

NFC debt service ratios and deviations from LT averages (Source: BIS; CMMP)

While the level of HH indebtedness in France is low in absolute and relative terms, the risks associated with excess HH credit growth and affordability are elevated in this sector too. At the end of 2Q21, the HH debt ratio was 67% GDP, slightly below the 4Q20 peak level of 68%. The HH debt ratio is higher than the 61% EA average but below the 77% advanced average and the BIS threshold level of 85% GDP. Nonetheless, France has the seen the highest rate of excess HH credit growth over the past three years among EA and other advanced economies. The HH’s debt service ratio, while low in absolute terms, is also above its LT average (see “Global debt dynamics – IV” for more details and charts).

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the French government’s net borrowing and the level of government debt. The widening gap between France’s government debt ratio and those of the so-called “fiscally-conservative” economies is also a potential source of conflict with the EA. Viewed from a sector balances perspective, however, the government’s response was timely, necessary and appropriate. We are also more concerned about the risks associated with private sector debt dynamics, particularly in the highly indebted NFC sector.

More fundamentally, the headlines resulting from the Cour des Comptes’ report support our wider hypothesis that conventional macro thinking is flawed to the extent that it typically ignores private debt while seeing government debt as a problem rather than as a solution.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Steady as she goes II”

The recovery story in UK consumption remains steady rather than dramatic

The key chart

Aggregate UK card payments in relation to pre-pandemic levels (Source: ONS; CMMP)

The key message

Strip out seasonal effects and the “steady recovery” story for UK consumption remains on track.

The behaviour of UK households (HH) reached an important inflexion point in early 4Q21. The year also ended with monthly HH deposit flows, a useful proxy for uncertainty levels, falling to 0.6x pre-pandemic levels and improving monthly and quarterly consumer credit trends. Positive news.

So-called “faster indicators” for estimating credit and debit card payments indicate weakness in spending at the start of the 2022. The ONS suggests that these trends were consistent with seasonal effects, however. Spending has recovered more recently with “aggregate” and “social” payments slightly below pre-pandemic levels and “staples” and “work-related” payments both above.

Payments on durable items, such as clothing and furniture, remain below pre-pandemic levels. This matters because payments on these items represent the best proxy for a more sustained recovery in UK consumption and a return of some of the c£162bn excess savings built up during the pandemic to more productive use.

In short, the message from the money sector is one of a steady rather than a dramatic recover in UK consumption so far…

Steady as she goes II – six charts that matter

Monthly HH money flows (£bn) since January 2019 (Source: BoE; CMMP)

In early December 2021, I argued that the behaviour of UK HHs had reached a potentially important inflexion point at the start off the 4Q21. Monthly money flows (a proxy for HH uncertainty) had moderated sharply (see chart above) and monthly consumer credit flows had reached new YTD highs. I also warned, however, that the emergence of the omicron variant and renewed restrictions might result in “these points being missed, or worse still, reversed”.

Monthly consumer credit flows (£bn, LHS) and YoY growth rate (RHS) (Source: BoE; CMMP)

The year actually ended on a relatively positive note. Monthly HH deposit flows dropped to £2.7bn, 0.6x their pre-pandemic levels (see first chart in this section above). Monthly consumer credit flows remained at c£1bn in the last three months of 2021 (see chart above), delivering the largest quarterly flows since the pandemic hit the UK economy (see chart below). Of course, the YoY growth rate in consumer credit of 1.4% YoY remains relatively modest in relation to past trends and negative in real terms.

Quarterly flows in UK consumer credit (£bn) (Source: BoE; CMMP)

So-called “faster-indicators” for estimating UK spending on credit and debit cards point to volatility/weakness in consumer spending at the start of 2022.

Aggregate card spending in relation to pre-pandemic levels (Source: ONS; CMMP)

Aggregate card payments fell from 130% of their pre-pandemic levels on Christmas Eve 2021 to 75% on the 4th January 2022. Since then they have recovered steadily to 96% of their pre-pandemic levels by 3rd February 2022 (see chart above). The ONS suggests that observed trends are consistent with seasonal effects.

Card spending in relation to pre-pandemic levels broken down by type (Source: ONS; CMMP)

“Aggregate” and “social” payments have recovered, but remain slightly below pre-pandemic levels as of early February 2022. “Staples” and “work-related” payments have recovered the most and are both above their respective pre-pandemic levels (see chart above). The chart illustates the difference between current payments and average payment levels in February 2020 in percentage points.

Aggregate payments and payments on durable goods in relation to pre-pandemic levels
(Source: ONS; CMMP)

Payments on durable items, such as clothing and furniture, remain below pre-pandemic levels (see chart above). This matters because payments on these items represent the best proxy for a more sustained recovery in UK consumption and a return of some of the c£162bn excess savings built up during the pandemic to more productive use.

Conclusion

In short, the message from the money sector is one of a steady rather than a dramatic recover in UK consumption so far…

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Singing from the same song sheet”

Consistent messaging from the UK and EA money sectors

The key chart

Consistent trends in broad money growth (% YoY) (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

The key message

UK and euro area (EA) money sectors have sent remarkably consistent messages throughout the COVID-pandemic. Shared trends in monetary aggregates, for example, provided similar conclusions regarding household (HH) behaviour, consumption and growth, the challenges facing policy makers, and the productivity of lending to the private sector (PSC).

The 4Q21 proved to be an important inflexion point in terms of HH confidence and behaviour in both regions. By December 2021, monthly deposit flows had moderated to 0.6x and 0.7x their pre-pandemic levels in the UK and EA respectively, leaving excess savings of c£162bn and c€285bn in the form of bank deposits. Demand for consumer credit recovered to 1.4% YoY and 1.2% YoY in the UK and EA respectively, and quarterly flows were positive in each of the past three quarters. So far, so good.

In addition to rising inflation, the Bank of England and the ECB both face on-going challenges in terms of the persistent desychronisation of money and credit cycles, which limits monetary policy effectiveness, and the fact that policy responses to date have fuelled growth in the wrong type of credit. The gap between the growth in money supply (ST liabilities of banks) and growth in PSC (key assets of banks) has narrowed but remains wide by historic standards. Nonetheless, the build-up of excess liquidity in both regions is slowing. Mortgage lending, the largest element of so-called “FIRE-based” lending, continues to be the main driver of PSC in the UK and the EA. This has potentially negative implications for growth, leverage, income inequality and financial stability.

In short, the money sectors in the UK and EA continue to sing from the same song sheet. The message for corporates, policy makers and investors alike is that an important inflexion point was reached in terms of HH confidence and behaviour in 4Q21. This is welcome news.

Of course, policy challenges remain and a slowdown in excess liquidity and/or a diversion into productive COCO-based lending rather than less productive FIRE-based lending may be less welcome news for financial assets in 2022.

Singing from the same song sheet

Consistent trends in broad money growth (% YoY) (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

The money sectors in the UK and the euro area (EA) have sent remarkably consistent messages throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We know that narrow money (M1), and overnight deposits within M1, drove the expansion of broad money (M4ex, M3 respectively) in both regions during 2020, for example. In other words, the rise in broad money illustrated in the chart above was a reflection of the deflationary forces of increased savings and delayed consumption.

We also know that, as at the end of December 2021, M1 represented 68% and 73% of M3 in the UK and the EA, up from 48% and 51% respectively a decade earlier (see chart below). Preference for highly liquid assets remains high, despite the negative real returns earned from those assets.

Narrow money as a share of broad money since December 2011 (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

A sustained recovery in both regions required/requires a reversal of these deflationary trends ie, a moderation in monthly HH deposit flows and a recovery in consumer credit (see “Three key charts for 2021”). Central banks also need to see a resynching of money and credit cycles. Why? Because, monetary policy effectiveness is based on certain stable relationships between monetary aggregates.

Monthly HH deposit flows as a multiple (x) of pre-pandemic levels (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

As noted in “Missing the point?” in December 2021, HH behaviour reached a potentially important inflexion point at the start of the 4Q21. Monthly deposit flows (see chart above) peaked at 5.9x pre-pandemic levels in the UK in May 2020 and 2.4x pre-pandemic levels in the EA in April 2020. In December 2021, these flows had moderated to 0.6x and 0.7x pre-pandemic levels respectively. During this process HHs have accumulated excess savings in the form of bank deposits of £162bn in the UK and €285bn in the EA (CMMP estimates).

Growth rates (% YoY) in consumer credit (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Annual growth rates in consumer credit reached a low point in February 2021 in both the UK (-10% YoY) and the EA (-3% YoY). In December 2021, however, annual growth rates had recovered to 1.4% YoY and 1.2% YoY respectively in the UK and EA respectively (see chart above). More importantly perhaps, quarterly flows of consumer credit have been positive and rising for the past three quarters (see chart below). The 4Q21 flows of £3bn and €4bn in the UK and EA respectively remain below pre-pandemic levels, however, especially in the EA where quarterly flows averaged €10bn during 2018-2019.

Quarterly flows in consumer credit (£bn, EURO bn) (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the desynchronisation of money and credit cycles in the UK and EA creating major challenges for policy makers, banks and investors alike. The degree of this desynchronisation peaked in early 2021 and reached its narrowest level since early 2020 in December 2021 (see chart below). That said, the gap between the growth rates of money supply (short-term liabilities of banks) and private sector lending (the main asset of banks) persists and remains high in a historic context.

Growth in lending (% YoY) minus growth in money supply (% YoY) (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Mortgage lending, the largest element of so-called “FIRE-based lending”, continues to be the main driver of PSC growth in both regions (see chart below). In December 2021, mortgage lending grew 5.1% YoY in the UK and 5.4% YoY in the EA. Lending to NFCs, the largest element of more productive “COCO-based lending”, rose 4.2% YoY in the EA but fell -0.4% YoY in the UK. As described above, consumer credit, another form of COCO-based lending grew 1.4% YoY and 1.2% YoY in the UK and EA respectively.

Breakdown on PSC growth by type of lending (% YoY) (Source: BoE; ECB; CMMP)

Conclusion

The money sectors in the UK and EA continue to sing from the same song sheet. The message for corporates, policy makers and investors alike is that an important inflexion point was reached in terms of HH confidence and behaviour in 4Q21. This is welcome news. Of course, policy challenges remain and a slowdown in excess liquidity and/or a diversion into productive COCO-based lending rather than less productive FIRE-based lending may be less welcome news for financial assets in 2022.

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“Slow and steady as she goes”

HH behaviour is normalising but policy challenges remain in the euro area

The key chart

Monetary developments in the euro area since 1999 (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The key message

Broad money growth in the euro area (EA) slowed to 6.9% in December 2021, the slowest rate of growth since February 2020. What is the main driver here and what are the messages for household behaviour, growth, macro policy and the productiveness of lending?

Narrow money (9.8% YoY) continues to be the main driver of broad money growth, contributing 7ppt to the overall 6.9% growth. Overnight deposits (10.1% YoY) contributed 6.2ppt alone. Note (again) that money sitting idly in overnight deposits contributes to neither growth nor inflation. Explanations for rising inflation lie elsewhere.

The on-going moderation in monthly household (HH) deposit flows indicates reduced uncertainty and a normalisation of behaviour. While these flows rose from €17bn in November 2021 to €23bn in December 2021, they remain below the pre-pandemic average of €33bn.

HHs repaid €3.3bn in consumer credit in December 2021, the first net repayments since April 2021. That said, positive quarterly flows of consumer credit of €2bn, €4bn and €b4bn in 2Q21, 3Q21 and 4Q21 respectively also point to a steady normalisation in HH behaviour.

Money and credit cycles remain out-of-synch with each other, presenting an on-going challenge to policy makers. The degree of de-synchronisation reached its narrowest level since March 2020, however, an indication that the build-up of excess liquidity in the EA is slowing.

The additional challenge for policy makers is that less productive FIRE-based lending continues to be the main driver of PSC. This re-enforces the need for macroprudential polices to address rising financial stability risks in the residential real estate (RRE) sector.

In short, the message from the money sector at the end of 2021 and the start of 2022 is mixed. HH behaviour is normalising with deposit flows moderating and demand for consumer credit recovering. Against this, policy makers face the dual challenge of de-synchronised money and credit cycles and excess growth in less-productive FIRE-based lending. Four key signals to watch in 2022…

Slow and steady as she goes

Long-term trends in EA broad money (% YoY) (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Broad money (M3) growth in the euro area (EA) slowed from 7.4% YoY in November 2021 to 6.9% YoY in December 2022, the slowest rate of growth since February 2021 (see chart above). This post examines the current drivers of broad money growth and the implications for household behaviour, growth, macro policy and the productivity of lending in the EA.

Twenty year trends in M3 (% YoY) and contribution (ppt) from M1 (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Narrow money (M1) continues to be the key driver of broad money growth in the EA. M1 grew 9.8% YoY in December 2021 and contributed 7.0ppt to the overall 6.9% growth in broad money alone (see chart above). Within M1, overnight deposits grew 10.1% YoY and contributed 6.2ppt to M3 growth while currency in circulation grew 7.7% YoY and contributed 0.7ppt to M3 growth.

The key point here is that growth in overnight deposits has been the main driver of broad money growth during the COVID-19 pandemic. This matters because money sitting idly in bank deposits contributes to neither growth nor inflation. The causes of rising inflation lie elsewhere.

Trends in monthly HH deposits (EURbn) since January 2019 (Source: ECB; CMMP)

The on-going moderation in monthly household (HH) deposit flows indicates reduced uncertainty and a normalisation of HH behaviour. The sharp rise seen during Phase 2 of the pandemic (see chart above) was driven by a combination of forced and precautionary HH savings – that is, money that was not spent. At their peak of €78bn in April 2020, monthly flows were almost 2.5x their pre-pandemic levels.

In December 2021, monthly flows had fallen back to €23bn, up from €17bn in November 2021, but below the pre-pandemic average level of €33bn. Similarly, HH deposit flows for the 4Q21 were €59bn, down from €109bn and €93bn in the 3Q21 and 2Q21 respectively and below the average €99bn quarterly flows recorded during 2019.

Monthly flows (EUR bn) and growth rates (% YoY) in consumer credit (Source: ECB; CMMP)

HHs repaid €3.3bn in consumer credit in December 2021. This was the first net repayment since April 2021 (see chart above). That said, quarterly flows of consumer credit €2bn, €4bn and €b4bn in 2Q21, 3Q21 and 4Q21 respectively (see chart below) also point to a normalisation in HH behaviour.

Quarterly flows (EUR bn) in consumer credit (Source: ECB; CMMP)
Trends in money and credit cycles in the euro area (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Money and credit cycles remain out-of-synch with each other, presenting an on-going challenge to policy makers. The gap between the YoY growth rate of PSC (4.7%) and the YoY growth rate in M3 (6.9%) was -2.8ppt in December 2021 (see chart above). While the degree of de-synchronisation has reached its narrowest level since March 2020, the challenge for policy makers remains since, “monetary policy effectiveness is based on certain stable relationships between monetary aggregates” (Richard Koo, The Holy Grail of Macroeconomics).

Trends in PSC (% YoY) in nominal and real terms (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Private sector credit (PSC) grew 3.9% YoY in nominal terms in December 2021 but fell -1.0% YoY in real terms (see chart above). The additional challenge for policy makers is that less productive FIRE-based lending continues to be the main driver of EA credit. FIRE-based lending contributed 2.5ppt to the overall 3.9% YoY growth rate in PSC in December 2022 (see chart below). Mortgages alone contributed 2.1ppt to this, re-enforcing the need for macroprudential polices to address rising financial stability risks in the residential real estate sector.

Trends in PSC (% YoY) and breakdown (ppt) between FIRE-based and COCO-based lending (Source: ECB; CMMP)

On a final positive note, the contribution of more productive COCO-based lending to overall PSC growth hit its highest level since March 2021 (see chart below), but all forms of COCO-based lending declined YoY in real terms.

Trends in PSC (% YoY) and contribution (ppt) of COCO-based lending (Source: ECB; CMMP)

Conclusion

In conclusion, the message from the money sector at the end of 2021 and the start of 2022 is mixed. HH behaviour is normalising with deposit flows moderating and demand for consumer credit recovering. Against this, policy makers face the dual, on-going challenge of de-synchronised money and credit cycles and excess growth in less-productive FIRE-based lending. Four key signals for 2022…

Please note that the summary comments and charts above are extracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.