“Sustainable debt dynamics” – Asia private sector credit

Global finance is shifting East but are current Asian PSC debt dynamics sustainable?

The key chart

Figure 1: A striking feature in Asia is that the highest levels of “excess credit growth” (3-year RGF 1Q19) have occured in economies where debt ratios are already high
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Summary

In “The Changing Face of Global Debt”, I argued that global finance was shifting East and towards emerging markets. In this post, I summarise my analysis of the sustainability of current Asian PSC trends. The key points:

  • Classifications of Asian economies as either “advanced” or “emerging” economies are over-simplistic and unhelpful
  • Relative growth factor (RGF) analysis provides a simple, first tool for assessing the sustainability of debt dynamics
  • The risks associated with “excess credit growth” across EM are much lower than in previous cycles
  • The striking feature in Asia, however, is the fact that the highest levels of “excess credit growth” have occurred in economies that already exhibit high debt levels (Hong Kong, China, Korea and Japan)
  • In Hong Kong and China, these risk are compounded by debt service ratios that are close to peak levels and well above LT averages (“affordability risk”)
  • RGF-related risks appear relatively low in Asia’s two large and “genuine emerging markets” – India and Indonesia
  • Relatively high excess HH growth rates in India and China remain a key focus point.

Time for new classifications?

The BIS classifies Asian reporting countries into two categories: three “advanced” economies (Japan, Australia and New Zealand) and eight “emerging” economies (China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand).

Such broad classifications are unhelpful, at best, and inaccurate, at worst. The classification of Japan, Australia and New Zealand as advanced economies is logical but masks different exposures to HH (Australia and New Zealand) and NFC (Japan) debt dynamics.

Figure 2: HH and NFC debt ratios (% GDP) for Asian reporting economies plotted against BIS threshold levels (in red)
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

The grouping of China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand together as emerging economies is more troublesome as it ignores the wide variations in market structure, growth opportunities, risks and secular challenges.

I prefer to consider China, Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore as unique markets. China is unique in terms of the level, structure and drivers of debt and in terms of the PBOC’s policy responses. Korea is unique in terms of having NFC and HH debt ratios that exceed both advanced economy averages and the BIS thresholds above which debt becomes a drag on future growth. Hong Kong and Singapore are both distinguished by their roles as regional financial centres but have different HH debt dynamics.

Malaysia and Thailand can be considered intermediate markets given that either both HH and NFC debt ratios (Malaysia) or one debt ratio (Thailand HH) exceed the average for emerging markets ex China. This leaves India and Indonesia as genuine emerging markets among the BIS reporting economies, with debt ratios below the emerging markets ex China average and well below BIS threshold levels (see Figure 2 above).

RGF analysis – “excess credit growth”

The theory

I have used the simple concept of relative growth factor (RGF) analysis since the early 1990s as a first step in analysing the sustainability of debt dynamics. In short, this approach compares the rate of “excess credit growth” with the level of debt penetration in a given economy.

The three year CAGR in debt is compared with the three year CAGR in nominal GDP to derive a relative growth factor. This is then compared with the level of debt expressed as a percentage of GDP (the debt ratio).

The concept is simple – one would expect relative high rates of “excess credit growth” in economies where the level of leverage is relatively low and vice versa. Conversely, red flags are raised when excess credit growth continues in economies that exhibit relatively high levels of leverage.

Low average risk in EM
Figure 3: Risks associated with “excess credit growth” across emerging markets are lower than in previous cycles (Trends in EM 3-year RGFs since March 2002)
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Figure 3 above, illustrates rolling 3-year RGF trends for EM economies highlighting previous unsustainable levels that peaked in 1Q04, 3Q09, 4Q11 and 2Q15. The current excess growth rate of 1.3% suggests, however, that EM sustainability risks are relatively low. If anything, the lack of growth/slowing growth are more immediate challenges

How does Asia stand out?
Figure 4: The key chart repeated! Asia RGF analysis illustrated as at end 1Q19 (3-year CAGR)
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis
Spotlight on Asia’s unique markets

A striking feature across Asia has been that some of the fastest rates of excess credit growth have occurred in economies where debt levels are already very high – Hong Kong, China, Korea and Japan (see Figure 4 above).

Figure 5: Trends in RGF for Asian economies with already high PSC debt ratios. China and Hong Kong slowing rapidly, Japan recovering.
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

The level of excess credit growth is already slowing sharply in Hong Kong and China from peak levels in excess of 6% (Figure 5). With debt service ratios in both economies close to peak levels and well above LT averages (Figures 6 and 7) a return to recent periods of excess growth is (1) unlikely and/or (2) would be associated with high levels of risk.

Figure 6: Hong Kong’s PSC debt service ratio is close to its historic high and well above LT average
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis
Figure 7: China’s PSC debt service ratio is also close to its historic high and well above LT average
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

In contrast, Japanese PSC growth is recovering from sustained periods of deficient credit demand, helped by relatively low debt service ratios that are well below their LT averages (Figure 8 below). The recent uptick in excess Korean growth is unlikely to be sustainable, however, given that both HH and HFC debt levels are above BIS thresholds (Figure 2 above)

Figure 8: Japan’s PSC debt service ratio displays a very different dynamic – the DSR is low in absolute terms and well below LT average
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Asia’s intermediate and emerging markets

RGF factors for intermediate and emerging Asian markets indicate relatively low levels of sustainability risk. Both India and Indonesia have been through periods of adjustment from previous phases of excess credit growth.

Figure 9: Rolling 3-year RGFs for Asia’s intermediate and emerging economies
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

In the former case, there are very different dynamics between the rapidly growing HH and slow growing NFC sector. The risks associated with excess credit growth in the HH sector (from a low base) are rising but remain relatively low in the NFC sector which is still in an adjustment phase.

Figure 10: India’s HH and NFC sectors are displaying sharply contrasting debt dynamics
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Indonesia’s growth rates have adjusted from the 2000-14 period of “super-charged” growth which was driven largely by exogenous factors including the commodities super-cycle and portfolio inflows during the period of global QE and record low US interest rates.

In summary, the risk associated with excess credit growth across EM are lower than in previous cycles. Asia stands out, however, because the highest rates of growth have occured in economies that already have high debt ratios. In China and Hong Kong, these risks are compounded by high debt service ratios indicating rising “affordability” risks. RGFs in both economies are adjusting sharply lower in response. Risks in intermediate and emerging Asian economies appear lower, but the relatively high excess HH growth rates in India and China remain a key focus point.

Please note that the summary comments above are abstracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.

“The changing face of global debt”

Global finance continues to shift to the East and towards emerging markets making it unrecognisable from the industry that existed twenty years ago

The key chart

The changing face of global debt (% of total PSC) – shifting East and towards emerging markets
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Summary

In this post, I summarise my analysis of the latest Bank of International Settlement (BIS) Quarterly Review with respect to level and trends in global debt and global debt ratios. The key points are:

  • The level of global debt hit a new high of $183 trillion in 1Q19
  • Global debt ratios – debt expressed as a percentage of GDP – have rebounded since 3Q18, but remain below peak 1Q18 levels.
  • Deleveraging continues, however, in all sectors across the Euro Area
  • Emerging markets remain the most dynamic segment of global finance, accounting for 36% of total private sector credit compared to only 10% two decades ago
  • China remains the main driver of this growth, accounting for 24% of global PSC, but the misallocation of credit towards SOEs continues
  • Global finance continues to shift East and towards emerging markets making it unrecognisable from the industry that existed twenty years
  • Further research analyses (1) whether current trends are sustainable and (2) the associated investment risks.

A new high for global debt levels

The level and breakdown of global debt between governments, corporates (NFC) and households (HH)
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

The level of global debt hit a new high of $183 trillion at the end of 1Q19. Corporate (NFC) credit is the largest sub-segment (39% of total) at $72 trillion. Government debt is the second largest sub-segment (35% of total) at $65 trillion, while household credit is the smallest sub-segment (25% of total) at $47 trillion.

Aggregating NFC and HH credit together, private sector credit totals $118 trillion or 65% of total global debt, down from 70% at the end of 2008. The shift in the balance of total debt from the private sector to government debt since the GFC reflects a shift from HH to government debt. In 2008, the split of total debt between HH, NFC and government debt was 31%, 39% and 30%. Today, the split it is 25%, 39%, 35% (1Q19).

The level and breakdown of global debt between the government and the private sector (PSC)
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Leverage is also rising again…

Trends in total global debt and global debt ratios
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Global debt ratios – debt expressed as a percentage of GDP – have risen for two consecutive quarters (an end to recent deleveraging trends) but remain below peak 1Q18 levels. The outstanding stock of global debt across all sectors fell between 1Q18 and 3Q18 before rebounding in 4Q18 and 1Q19. Debt ratios have rebounded but remain below peak levels.

Viewed over a twelve month period, we can observe different forms of deleveraging in action. In the HH and government sectors the absolute stock of debt has risen (to new highs) over the past twelve months but at a slower rate than the growth in nominal GDP. This represents a passive form of deleveraging as the debt ratio declines despite the stock rising in absolute terms. In contrast, the absolute level of NFC debt in 1Q19 ($72 trillion) is slightly below the level recorded in 1Q18 ($73 trillion). Hence the fall in the NFC debt ratio from 97% to 94% over the twelve months represents a mild form of active deleveraging.

Despite the recent rebound, the NFC sector has seen a mild form of active deleveraging over the past twelve months
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Recent developments provide some support for the concept of debt thresholds ie, the level of debt above which debt becomes a drag on growth. The BIS estimate that this threshold in 90% for the NFC sector and 85% for the HH and government sectors. At the end of 1Q2019, NFC debt stood above this threshold at 94%, government debt was just below at 84%, while HH debt was well below at 60%. In short, the different form of deleveraging in the NFC sector described above reflects the fact that NFC debt ratios remain too high and above the BIS thresholds.

…except in the Euro Area

Private sector credit in the Euro Area is slightly lower now ($21 trillion) than in 3Q09 ($22 trillion)
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

However, gradual deleveraging continues in all sectors in the Euro Area. Interestingly, Euro Area deleveraging began first in the HH sector where debt ratios peaked at 64% in 4Q12. As elsewhere, this has been a passive form of deleveraging where the absolute stock of HH debt rises (to a new peak level in 1Q19) at a slower rate that the growth in nominal GDP. Total, PSC, NFC and government debt levels peaked later (1Q15) and have involved both passive and active forms of deleveraging. The stock of total debt reached new highs at the end of 1Q19 in total and in the PSC and HH sectors. In contrast, it is falling in the NFC and government sector where deleveraging is in its active form and where debt ratios of 105% and 98% remain above their respective BIS threshold levels.

On-going deleveraging in the Euro Area depresses global debt ratios – but progress is slow due to the type of deleveraging involved
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Emerging market dynamism…

Trends in global debt with breakdown between advanced and emerging markets
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Emerging markets remain the most dynamic segment of global finance, accounting for 36% of total private sector credit compared to only 10% two decades ago. Emerging market PSC totalled $42 trillion at the end of 1Q19 a rise of 225% over the past ten years or a CAGR of 12% per annum. Of this, NFC credit totalled $30 trillion (71% total PSC) and HH credit totalled $12 trillion (29% total PSC). NFC credit is typically larger than HH credit in emerging markets due to their relative stage in industry development. For reference the split between NFC and HH credit in advanced economies is currently 55% and 45% respectively.

Emerging market debt accounts for 36% of total PSC versus only 10% twenty years ago
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Debt ratios are catching up with the developed world and in some cases now exceed the BIS threshold levels too. PSC, HH and NFC debt levels reached 142%, 42% and 101% of GDP at the end of 1Q19 versus respective ratios of 162%, 89% and 72% respectively for advanced economies. Note that emerging NFC debt ratios currently exceed the BIS threshold but this reflects (1) the impact of China, which is discussed below, and (2) the fact that the BIS choses to include Hong Kong (NFC debt 222% of GDP) and Singapore (NFC debt 117% of GDP) in its sample of emerging economies.

Playing “catch-up” – emerging market PS debt ratios (% GDP) are close to advanced economies’ levels
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

…driven by China

China remains the main driver of EM debt growth and now accounts for 24% of global private sector credit alone. PSC growth in China has grown 366% over the past ten years at a CAGR of 17% to reach $28 trillion at the end of 1Q19. Of this NFC credit was $21 trillion (74%) and HH credit was $7 trillion (26%), but it should be noted that China’s SOEs account for 68% of total NFC credit*.

Twenty years ago, China accounted from 3% of global debt and 31% of total EM debt. Today, these shares have risen to 24% and 67% respectively. China’s outstanding stock of debt exceeded the rest of EM in 3Q11.

China leaves the rest of EM behind after 3Q11 (PSC % GDP)
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

The NFC debt ratio peaked at 163% of GDP in 1Q17 and fell to 152% in 4Q18 as the growth in NFC debt lagged growth in GDP. However, in the 1Q19, this ratio rose back to 155% and remains well above the BIS threshold of 90%.

*The supply of credit to (the more profitable) private sector NFCs remains constrained and well below the BIS threshold, highlighting the on-going misallocation of credit in the Chinese economy. Further analysis of China’s debt dynamics follows in future posts.

China’s NFC debt ratio is rising again despite being well above the BIS threshold (90%) and levels seen in the RoW
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Shifting East and towards EM

Growth in global debt increasing driven the China and EM ($ trillions)
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Global finance continues to shift to the East and towards emerging markets making it unrecognisable from the industry that existed twenty years. In March 2000, global debt was structured split between advanced economies ex Euro Area (70%), the Euro Area (20%), emerging markets ex China (7%) and China (3%). Today, those splits are 47%, 18%, 12% and 24% respectively. The face of global debt is changing dramatically.

My next research analyses (1) whether current trends are sustainable and (2) the investment risks associated with these trends

The changing face of global debt (% PSC debt outstanding)
Source: BIS; Haver; CMMP analysis

Please note that the summary comments above are abstracts from more detailed analysis that is available separately.